Revision summary
Articles 148–151 and the 1971 Act make the CAG the Union and State auditor. Legality is sanction, appropriation and rule-compliance. Propriety and performance audit test waste and value for money even when vouchers are valid. PAC is the parliamentary partner; major performance reports mixed both functions. Indian audit is overwhelmingly after the spend, so the report must sting. The CAG cannot convict or make policy; it can still refuse to be a mere notary.
Model answer
Introduction
Article 148 makes the Comptroller and Auditor General an independent constitutional officer. The job is not only to ask whether a rupee was spent under a valid appropriation. It is also to ask whether that rupee was spent as a trustee would spend it. That second question is propriety. The quote is the doctrine of Indian audit, not a slogan.
Body
Legality
Without a legality check, public finance is a rumour.
- Peg: The Comptroller and Auditor-General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971, and the audit codes, require audit of receipts and expenditure of the Union and the States.
- Peg: Article 151 carries the report to the President or Governor, then to the House.
- Peg: Legality means sanction, a budget head, a competent authority, and compliance with General Financial Rules and the scheme’s own rules.
Propriety and performance
Propriety asks whether expenditure was excessive, wasteful or avoidable even if each voucher was stamped.
- Peg: Buying a machine that is not needed, or designing a stadium that cannot be used after the games, can be legal and still improper.
- Peg: Performance audit — economy, efficiency, effectiveness — grew from that habit; reports on spectrum allocation, the Commonwealth Games, coal-block allotments and leaking food grain mixed illegal process with waste.
- Peg: The Public Accounts Committee is the parliamentary half of the same function: the CAG supplies the facts; the PAC questions the ministry.
- Peg: India’s CAG is largely post-audit, unlike the old British Comptroller who could stop issue; that makes the sting of the report, after the event, even more important.
Limits
A CAG who only stamps legality is a notary; a CAG who pretends to be a court is something else.
- Peg: The CAG does not convict; an audit figure is not a trial.
- Peg: Policy choice — whether to run a welfare scheme — is the executive’s; how the scheme leaked is the CAG’s.
- Peg: Over-reach into policy is a real risk; under-reach into polite legality is the older vice.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD S[Spend] --> L[Legality] S --> P[Propriety] P --> R[Article 151 report] R --> PAC[Public Accounts Committee] PAC --> H[House] L --> R
Conclusion
Legality keeps spend inside the Appropriation Act. Propriety asks whether the spend was worthy of public trust. Both belong to the CAG; neither turns the office into a court.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q5). View answer →
-
Can the CAG stop a payment in advance?
In the main Union system, no. Indian audit is overwhelmingly after the spend, unlike the old British Exchequer control.
-
Is a CAG figure automatically a scam?
No. It is an audit finding. Loss, criminality and policy are for the PAC, investigators and the House.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021. -
2024 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies. -
2024 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
Public charitable trusts have the potential to make India's development more inclusive as they relate to certain vital public issues. Comment. -
2024 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
The Doctrine of Democratic Governance makes it necessary that the public perception of the integrity and commitment of civil servants becomes absolutely positive. Discuss. -
2023 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India. -
2023 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment. -
2023 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of Presiding Officers of state legislatures in maintaining order and impartiality in conducting legislative work and in facilitating best democratic practices. -
2023 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions.
More from this topic
Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.
Governance and Policy
Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.
Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.
Governance and Policy
The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.
Governance and Policy
Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.