Q5 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q4 Q6 →

Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies.

Topic: Governance and Policy. Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Governance and Policy.

Revision summary

The 73rd and 74th Amendments create panchayats and municipalities with the Eleventh and Twelfth Schedules. Good local governance needs functions, funds and functionaries, plus live Gram Sabhas and ward committees. Merger helps peri-urban planning, tax and utilities. Merger hurts rural voice, PESA areas and the distinct 73rd settlement. Article 243Q already invents the nagar panchayat as a half-merge. Metropolitan planning committees can share utilities without killing the Gram Sabha. The test is the peri-urban belt, not a nationwide glue.

Model answer

Introduction

  • Local bodies are the third stratum after the 73rd and 74th Amendments: panchayats for the village, municipalities for the town. Good governance at that level is water, streets, primary health, schools, property tax and a grievance that does not need a yatra to the Secretariat. Whether rural and urban bodies should merge is the question the census town and the peri-urban belt ask every decade.

Body

Local bodies and good governance

The schedules are live only when functions, funds and functionaries move with them.

  • Peg: Articles 243G and 243W, the Eleventh and Twelfth Schedules, and State conformity Acts name the functions; the three Fs decide whether the name is real.
  • Peg: Where State Finance Commissions are timely, property tax is collected, and the Gram Sabha or ward committee actually sits, local bodies cut the last-mile gap that line departments cannot.
  • Peg: Failures are familiar: parallel schemes that skip the panchayat, MP/MLA local-area funds that recreate a second executive, delayed elections, and a CEO who answers to the State more than to the elected chair.
  • Peg: Urban bodies add planning, building bye-laws and transport; rural bodies add land, forests-as-livelihood and MGNREGA — the skill-sets are not identical.

Gains from merger

Census towns and villages glued to a municipal edge already share sewers, labour markets and crime.

  • Peg: A nagar panchayat or a municipal merger can unify master plans and stop the jurisdiction shrug over a drain.
  • Peg: A wider tax base and a city bus on the village road are real planning gains.
  • Peg: Climate drainage and solid waste do not honour the 73rd/74th line; some States have folded peri-urban panchayats into corporations for that reason.

Costs of merger

The 73rd Amendment was a rural political settlement, not a waiting room for a corporation.

  • Peg: Merge into a municipal corporation and the farmer’s vote is diluted by an urban density that does not live on that land.
  • Peg: PESA Gram Sabhas in Scheduled Areas are a further bar: merger without a Fifth Schedule conversation is a constitutional slight.
  • Peg: Forced municipalisation is also a tax event — property tax, trade licence — that villages may not have asked for.
  • Peg: The workable line is statutory agglomeration where the census already has: metropolitan planning committees (Article 243ZE) that actually meet, nagar panchayats for transitional areas, and shared utilities without extinguishing the Gram Sabha.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  R[73rd PRIs] --> G[Local goods]
  U[74th ULBs] --> G
  P[Peri-urban] --> M[Merge or share]
  M -->|plan tax drain| U
  M -->|Gram Sabha PESA| R
  N[Nagar panchayat] --> M

Conclusion

Local bodies govern well when the three Fs are real. Merging rural and urban houses can fix peri-urban mess. It can also erase a rural constitutional identity. Transitional forms beat a single nationwide glue.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety." Comment.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    Public charitable trusts have the potential to make India's development more inclusive as they relate to certain vital public issues. Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    The Doctrine of Democratic Governance makes it necessary that the public perception of the integrity and commitment of civil servants becomes absolutely positive. Discuss.

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.

    View answer →

  7. 2023 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks

    Discuss the role of Presiding Officers of state legislatures in maintaining order and impartiality in conducting legislative work and in facilitating best democratic practices.

    View answer →

  8. 2023 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks

    Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.

Governance and Policy

Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.

Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.

Governance and Policy

The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.

Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.

Governance and Policy

Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.