Q7 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks · 3 min read

← Q6 Q8 →

Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions.

Topic: Governance and Policy. Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and Governance and Policy.

Revision summary

Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, bans abuse of dominance, including by MNCs. The CCI investigates, orders modification of terms, and may penalise; NCLAT hears appeals. 2022 public orders against Google on Android licensing and Play billing are the main digital-abuse precedents. The 2022 MakeMyTrip–Goibibo order and the Amazon–Flipkart investigation show platform intermediation is inside CCI’s reach. Enforcement works when the Indian relevant market is defined; monitoring of remedies is the unfinished part of the role.

Model answer

Introduction

The Competition Act, 2002, prohibits abuse of dominant position under Section 4, whether the enterprise is Indian or a multi-national corporation. The Competition Commission of India investigates, orders cease-and-desist, modifies agreements, and may impose penalties; appellate review then sits with the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.

Body

Legal role

  • Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, lists abuses: unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices, limiting production or technical development, denying market access, and using dominance in one market to enter another.
  • Dominance is not illegal; abuse is. MNCs are judged by the same relevant-market and dominance tests as domestic firms.
  • The Commission can order a Director General investigation, pass interim orders, and require modification of platform or licensing terms that lock in users.
  • Combinations under Sections 5 and 6 (now with the 2023 amendment’s deal-value threshold) let the CCI look at mergers of global firms that affect Indian markets.

Recent public decisions involving large digital and platform firms

  • In 2022 the CCI held that Google had abused its dominant position in licensable mobile operating systems and in the Play Store by restrictive Android licensing and pre-installation conditions (the Android case).
  • In a related 2022 order the CCI held that Google had abused dominance in the app-store billing market by forcing Play billing on app developers (the Play billing case).
  • In 2022 the CCI found MakeMyTrip–Goibibo to have abused dominance in the online hotel intermediation market, including through arrangements that hurt competing hotel chains such as OYO; this is a platform case with global investors, not a small domestic shop.
  • The CCI directed investigation into Amazon and Flipkart in 2020 on allegations of deep discounting and preferential listing; that probe is a public enforcement step against large e-commerce MNCs, even where a final penalty order was not the 2023 headline.
  • These matters went through stay and appeal; the role of the CCI is to open the Indian relevant market, not to write the last appellate word.

Limits

  • Global pricing, data localisation, and app-store rules change faster than a Section 26 inquiry.
  • Remedies on algorithms and self-preferencing need technical monitoring that a small commission can under-staff.
  • Overlap with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, telecom licensing, and incoming digital-competition proposals can fragment the same MNC conduct across regulators.

Recommendations

  • Staff digital units that can monitor behavioural remedies after Google-type orders, not only levy a first penalty.
  • Use the deal-value merger threshold so asset-light MNC acquisitions of Indian start-ups do not escape notice.
  • Coordinate CCI, TRAI, and MeitY so platform dominance is not litigated three times with three inconsistent definitions of the market.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  A[Competition Act 2002 s.4] --> C[CCI]
  C --> G[Google Android and Play 2022]
  C --> M[MakeMyTrip-Goibibo 2022]
  C --> E[Amazon Flipkart probe]
  G --> R[Conduct remedies and appeal]
  M --> R
  E --> R

Conclusion

The CCI contains MNC abuse by applying Section 4 to Indian relevant markets, as in the 2022 Google Android and Play billing orders, the MakeMyTrip–Goibibo order, and the Amazon–Flipkart investigation. Its role is real where it can define the market and enforce conduct remedies; appeals and capacity remain the constraint.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks

    Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    "The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks

    Discuss the role of Presiding Officers of state legislatures in maintaining order and impartiality in conducting legislative work and in facilitating best democratic practices.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks

    To what extent, in your opinion, as the decentralisation of power in India changed the governance landscape at the grassroots?

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    The Gati-Shakti Yojana needs meticulous coordination between the government and the private sector to achieve the goal of connectivity. Discuss.

    View answer →

  6. 2022 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks

    Reforming the government delivery system through the Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme is a progressive step, but it has its limitations too. Comment.

    View answer →

  7. 2022 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks

    India is an age-old friend of Sri Lanka.' Discuss India's role in the recent crisis in Sri Lanka in the light of the preceding statement.

    View answer →

  8. 2022 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks

    While the national political parties in India favour centralisation, the regional parties are in favour of State autonomy." Comment.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks

"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment.

Indian Constitution

Democracy needs courts that can enforce the Constitution against the elected majority. Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, charged salaries, and a hard removal process are the main guarantees. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC were struck down in 2015 as a threat to independence of appointments. Independence is a prerequisite; opacity of the collegium is a separate reform problem, not a reason to remove the guarantee.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks

Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.

Governance and Policy

Article 39A and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, create the right to free legal aid. Section 12 names SC/ST persons, women, children, persons in custody, workmen, persons with disability, disaster victims, and the income-poor. NALSA heads the statutory system of State authorities, court committees, clinics and Lok Adalats. The system is wide in design and still thin in quality of trial representation. Assessment therefore credits outreach and asks for better fees, first-hearing counsel, and published coverage data.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks

"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.

Governance and Policy

The 74th Amendment and the Twelfth Schedule create municipalities but leave devolution to State law. Parastatals and State-appointed commissioners keep functions out of the elected council. Property tax is constrained; GST ended octroi and sent compensation to States, not cities. Late State Finance Commissions and approval for borrowing keep cities fiscally dependent. The statement is correct: functional and financial empowerment is still a State choice.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.