Revision summary
Democracy needs courts that can enforce the Constitution against the elected majority. Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, charged salaries, and a hard removal process are the main guarantees. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC were struck down in 2015 as a threat to independence of appointments. Independence is a prerequisite; opacity of the collegium is a separate reform problem, not a reason to remove the guarantee.
Model answer
Introduction
Democracy needs an independent court that can hold the elected executive and the legislature to the Constitution. The Constitution of India therefore writes judicial independence into appointment, tenure, salaries, and speech in Parliament, rather than leaving it to political goodwill.
Body
Why independence is a democratic prerequisite
- A democracy is not only majority rule; it is majority rule under a written Constitution that the courts can enforce.
- Without independence, fundamental rights, federal limits, and free elections become paper promises that the government of the day can ignore.
- Articles 32 and 226 give the Supreme Court and the High Courts the power to issue writs; that power is useless if judges fear removal, pay cuts, or political posting.
Constitutional guarantees
- Article 50 directs the State to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State.
- Article 124 and Article 217 fix the manner of appointment and the tenure of Supreme Court and High Court judges, with removal only by a parliamentary address on proved misbehaviour or incapacity, which is the impeachment process used in the Justice V. Ramaswami episode and later motions.
- Salaries, privileges, and the administrative expenses of the Supreme Court are charged on the Consolidated Fund, so the annual vote cannot starve the Court.
- Article 121 and Article 211 bar discussion in Parliament and in a State legislature on the conduct of a sitting judge except on a motion for removal.
- The collegium practice after the Second and Third Judges Cases, and the striking down of the National Judicial Appointments Commission in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) after the Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014, show that the Court treats appointment insulation as part of independence.
Limits that the comment must record
- Independence is not a licence for a closed collegium; the 2015 judgment itself asked for a Memorandum of Procedure and for more transparency.
- Delay in filling vacancies, in-house opacity, and the unused but heavy impeachment process are real stresses, yet they do not cancel the need for a constitutional guarantee.
- A comment that is fair therefore treats Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, and the failed NJAC amendment, as the democratic minimum, not as a finished reform of the appointments system.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Democracy under Constitution] --> I[Independent courts] I --> A[Arts 124 and 217 tenure] I --> S[Arts 50 121 211] I --> N[NJAC 99th Amendment struck 2015] A --> R[Rights and federal limits enforced]
Conclusion
Constitutionally guaranteed independence is a prerequisite of democracy because only a secure court can enforce rights and limits against the majority of the day. India’s text supplies that security through appointment, tenure, money, and speech bars, even while appointments remain an unfinished public debate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Does impeachment make judges independent?
The high threshold of a parliamentary address on proved misbehaviour protects tenure. It is a safeguard, not a day-to-day disciplinary tool.
-
Did the 2015 case say the collegium cannot be improved?
No. The Court struck down the NJAC as designed, and still asked for a better, more transparent Memorandum of Procedure.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle. -
2024 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity. -
2023 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
" The Construction of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society". Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. -
2023 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the constitutional perspectives of Gender Justice with the help of relevant Constitutional Provisions and case laws. -
2023 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by the Union Governments since mid 1990s. -
2022 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Vice -Presidents of India as the chairman of the Rajyasabha. -
2022 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by ne Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature. -
2022 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected.
More from this paper
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.
Governance and Policy
Article 39A and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, create the right to free legal aid. Section 12 names SC/ST persons, women, children, persons in custody, workmen, persons with disability, disaster victims, and the income-poor. NALSA heads the statutory system of State authorities, court committees, clinics and Lok Adalats. The system is wide in design and still thin in quality of trial representation. Assessment therefore credits outreach and asks for better fees, first-hearing counsel, and published coverage data.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.
Governance and Policy
The 74th Amendment and the Twelfth Schedule create municipalities but leave devolution to State law. Parastatals and State-appointed commissioners keep functions out of the elected council. Property tax is constrained; GST ended octroi and sent compensation to States, not cities. Late State Finance Commissions and approval for borrowing keep cities fiscally dependent. The statement is correct: functional and financial empowerment is still a State choice.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
Compare and contrast the British and Indian approaches to Parliamentary sovereignty.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Dicey’s British doctrine makes Parliament legally unlimited and bars courts from voiding an Act. India’s Parliament is created by the Constitution and bound by Articles 13 and 245. Kesavananda Bharati (1973) placed basic structure beyond Article 368. Westminster political forms are shared; legal sovereignty is not. Indian parliamentary sovereignty is therefore limited, unlike the classical British model.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.