Revision summary
Articles 178 to 189 create Speakers and Chairmen of State legislatures. They maintain order by running questions, motions, and discipline under the House rules. Impartiality is tested in anti-defection cases under the Tenth Schedule. Kihoto Hollohan allows judicial review of the Speaker’s defection order; Nabam Rebia limits a compromised Chair. Best democratic practice is a fair share of floor time and timely, reviewable rulings, not a silent majority machine.
Model answer
Introduction
The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly and the Chairman of the Legislative Council are the Presiding Officers of the State legislature under Articles 178 to 189. Their daily work is order on the floor, and their harder work is impartiality when majority and opposition collide.
Body
Order in legislative work
- The Presiding Officer admits questions, motions, and points of order, and interprets the Rules of Procedure of the House.
- He or she names members, suspends them, and can order the gallery to be cleared, which is the ordinary power to keep debate possible.
- Money bills and the Governor’s messages are read through the Chair, so financial business depends on a working Speaker, not only on the treasury benches.
- Committees are nominated or constituted with the Chair’s involvement; disorder on the floor often follows if committee scrutiny is skipped.
Impartiality
- Article 189 and the Tenth Schedule place the Speaker at the centre of defection disputes inside the Assembly, which is the sharpest test of impartiality.
- Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1992) upheld the Tenth Schedule but made the Speaker’s order on defection subject to judicial review on limited grounds.
- Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh (2016) held that a Speaker facing a notice for his own removal cannot disqualify members in a way that decides the majority; the Court later revisited parts of this line in 2023 in Subhash Desai, but the democratic point remains that the Chair cannot be a faction tool.
- Resignation, swearing-in, and recognition of the Leader of the Opposition all pass through the Chair and can manufacture or deny a floor majority.
Democratic practices
- A Presiding Officer who gives the opposition a fair share of Question Hour, calling attention, and adjournment motions makes the House a forum, not a rally.
- Live proceedings, reasoned rulings, and restraint in using the marshal are democratic practices that no Article lists in detail but that every Assembly needs.
- Resignation from the ruling party after election as Speaker, as some Assemblies have practised, is a convention that supports impartiality even though the Constitution does not require it.
Recommendations
- Fix a time limit for Tenth Schedule decisions, as the Supreme Court has pressed, so that defection orders are not delayed until the term ends.
- Separate, as far as rules allow, the Speaker’s administrative majority from the treasury whip on ordinary legislative business.
- Train new Speakers in comparative rulings and publish them, so impartiality is a recorded practice, not a personal virtue.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Presiding Officer Arts 178-189] --> O[Order and rules] P --> I[Impartial Chair] P --> T[Tenth Schedule] T --> K[Kihoto Hollohan review] I --> D[Democratic floor practice]
Conclusion
Presiding Officers keep order through the rules and keep democracy alive only when they apply those rules without the whip. Kihoto Hollohan and Nabam Rebia show that the Chair is both a constitutional office and a reviewable power, which is why impartiality is the core of the role.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The crucial aspect of development process has been the inadequate attention paid to Human Resource Development in India. Suggest measures that can address this adequacy.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is the Speaker’s defection order final?
It is the first decision under the Tenth Schedule. Kihoto Hollohan allows courts to review it on constitutional grounds.
-
Must a Speaker leave his or her party?
The Constitution does not require it. Some Houses follow a convention of resignation from the party to signal impartiality.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India. -
2023 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment. -
2023 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions. -
2022 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
To what extent, in your opinion, as the decentralisation of power in India changed the governance landscape at the grassroots? -
2022 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
The Gati-Shakti Yojana needs meticulous coordination between the government and the private sector to achieve the goal of connectivity. Discuss. -
2022 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
Reforming the government delivery system through the Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme is a progressive step, but it has its limitations too. Comment. -
2022 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks
India is an age-old friend of Sri Lanka.' Discuss India's role in the recent crisis in Sri Lanka in the light of the preceding statement. -
2022 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
While the national political parties in India favour centralisation, the regional parties are in favour of State autonomy." Comment.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment.
Indian Constitution
Democracy needs courts that can enforce the Constitution against the elected majority. Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, charged salaries, and a hard removal process are the main guarantees. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC were struck down in 2015 as a threat to independence of appointments. Independence is a prerequisite; opacity of the collegium is a separate reform problem, not a reason to remove the guarantee.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.
Governance and Policy
Article 39A and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, create the right to free legal aid. Section 12 names SC/ST persons, women, children, persons in custody, workmen, persons with disability, disaster victims, and the income-poor. NALSA heads the statutory system of State authorities, court committees, clinics and Lok Adalats. The system is wide in design and still thin in quality of trial representation. Assessment therefore credits outreach and asks for better fees, first-hearing counsel, and published coverage data.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.
Governance and Policy
The 74th Amendment and the Twelfth Schedule create municipalities but leave devolution to State law. Parastatals and State-appointed commissioners keep functions out of the elected council. Property tax is constrained; GST ended octroi and sent compensation to States, not cities. Late State Finance Commissions and approval for borrowing keep cities fiscally dependent. The statement is correct: functional and financial empowerment is still a State choice.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.