Revision summary
The Legislative Council is a state’s optional second chamber under Articles 168–171. Its members come from local bodies, graduates, teachers, Assembly electors, and a nominated quota. It can revise and delay ordinary bills but cannot finally block money bills. Relevance lies in scrutiny and functional or local representation; the case against it is cost, delay, and patronage. Creation and abolition follow an Assembly resolution and a parliamentary law, so the Constitution treats the Council as useful only if a state will use it as a revising house.
Model answer
Introduction
A Legislative Council is the Vidhan Parishad, the optional second chamber of a state legislature under Articles 168 to 171. It is not a copy of the Rajya Sabha for every state. Its relevance is the live question: whether a revising house still earns its cost in a democratic system already based on the Vidhan Sabha.
Body
Design
Parliament may create or abolish a Council if the Legislative Assembly so resolves. Membership mixes elected teachers, graduates, local-body representatives, Assembly electors, and a Governor’s nominated quota of persons from literature, science, art, the cooperative movement, and social service. The Council cannot permanently block money bills. It can delay and revise ordinary legislation. This is a house of second thought and of functional representation, not a house of equal popular sovereignty.
Relevance
Supporters say a Council checks hasty bills, gives a voice to local bodies and professions, and offers a place for experienced persons who may not fight Assembly elections. In a large state, revision can improve drafting. Opponents say it is a parking place for party loyalists, a delay on majority programmes, and a colonial leftover. Several states have abolished Councils; others retain or seek them.
Relevance, then, is conditional. A Council is relevant where it actually revises and represents local government, as the 73rd Amendment’s panchayat system might suggest a need for a local-body stream. It is not relevant as a permanent veto on the Assembly. The constitutional design already limits it. The political task is to staff it for scrutiny rather than for patronage.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LC[Legislative Council] --> M[Mixed membership] LC --> R[Revise and delay] LC --> LIM[No permanent money-bill veto] REL[Relevance] --> SCR[Scrutiny] REL --> PAT[Patronage risk]
Conclusion
The Legislative Council is an optional revising chamber with a mixed electorate and limited power over money. It remains relevant as second thought and as a channel for local and professional voice. It loses relevance when it is only patronage. The Constitution leaves that choice to states under parliamentary approval.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the Council a federal house like the Rajya Sabha?
No. It represents categories within a state, not states in the Union. Federal second-chamber logic belongs to the Council of States at the Centre.
-
Why do some states want a Council and others not?
Parties may want revision, a wider elite, or berths for allies. Others see delay of their Assembly majority. The constitutional test should be scrutiny, not berths.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly. -
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement. -
2024 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of environmental movements in shaping environmental governance in India. -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.