Revision summary
Environmental governance in India is the official system for allocating forests, water, land, and pollution costs. Chipko politicised forest felling as a livelihood and women’s issue and weakened a purely contractor-and-department model. Narmada contested large dams, displacement, and rehabilitation, forcing public justification even when the project proceeded. Laws, EIA hearings, the NGT, constitutional environmental duties, and Gram Sabha-related rights are institutional responses to movement pressure. The development state was not replaced; it was compelled to add procedures and to argue in public, which is the movements’ principal shaping effect.
Model answer
Introduction
Environmental governance is the set of rules, agencies, and practices that decide who may use land, forest, water, and air, and who bears the cost. In India that governance was long a development-state affair: dams, mines, and forest departments in the lineage of colonial reservation and Nehru’s plans. Environmental movements forced that affair into public argument. They did not replace the state. They changed what the state had to justify.
Body
Chipko and the forest public
The Chipko movement in the Uttarakhand Himalaya in the 1970s made forest policy a question of local livelihood, not only of timber contracts. Villagers, including women, hugged trees and demanded a say in felling. The movement linked Gandhi’s local swaraj to ecology. It influenced later forest law debates, joint forest management talk, and the idea that hill women are environmental actors. Governance shifted from a purely departmental file to a recognised local claim, even when implementation remained uneven.
Narmada and the large-dam state
The Narmada Bachao Andolan contested displacement, the meaning of public purpose, and the quality of rehabilitation in the Sardar Sarovar and related projects. It used satyagraha, research, international advocacy, and the Supreme Court. The Court in 2000 allowed the dam to proceed under conditions, which showed both the reach and the limit of movement litigation. Environmental governance absorbed new rituals: environmental impact assessment, public hearings, and rehabilitation policies. It did not abandon the large-project model. The movement still changed the decision process. A dam now has to answer in public, which is a Habermas-like demand inserted into a planning state.
Other pressures and institutional response
Silent Valley, anti-mining struggles, urban clean-air litigation, and coastal protests similarly pulled ministries and courts. The 42nd Amendment’s environmental duties, Articles 48A and 51A(g), the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Forest Conservation Act, the National Green Tribunal, and EIA notifications are the legal sediment of crisis and mobilisation, not only of expert design. Pressure groups and scientists entered clearance committees. Federal tension appeared: states want projects; local communities want veto or voice. The Gram Sabha under the 73rd Amendment and later forest-rights legislation gave a statutory hook for local environmental will, which the question on Gram Sabha also names.
How far
Movements shaped governance by agenda-setting, by producing knowledge that official plans omitted, and by forcing procedures of hearing and clearance. They did not produce a consistently ecological state. Clearances can be ritual. Violence against activists continues. Growth politics still ranks high. The honest discussion is that environmental governance in India is a contested field that movements opened. Chipko and Narmada are the type-cases. The Planning Commission’s successor still thinks in projects; it must now do so under a louder local and judicial check.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EM[Environmental movements] --> CH[Chipko forests] EM --> NA[Narmada dams] EM --> LAW[EPA EIA NGT] EM --> LOC[Gram Sabha / local voice] ST[Development state] --> LAW
Conclusion
Environmental movements made forests, rivers, and displacement into national political issues and pushed the state toward assessment, hearings, tribunals, and local statutory voice. Chipko and Narmada show the pattern. Governance was reshaped as procedure and as argument, not as a complete change of development model. That partial reshaping is still a major political fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q8(b)). View answer →
-
Did the Supreme Court always side with movements?
No. Narmada showed the Court balancing development and rights, often allowing projects with conditions. Courts are part of governance, not a substitute for movements.
-
Is this the same as Gandhian planning?
Chipko drew on Gandhian localism. Official environmental governance remains inside a national development state. The overlap is the claim that locality must be heard.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly. -
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Relevance of the Legislative Council. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement. -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this topic
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Caste remains a vital axis for political mobilisation in India. How would the caste census address the aspirations of people? Discuss
Indian Nationalism
Caste remains a mobilisation axis because it still structures dignity, land, and access to the state, as Kothari, Mandal, and bahujan politics show. Parties already count jatis; the demand is that the official Census should too, beyond SC and ST. Aspirations include fairer reservation design, targeting of welfare, and recognition after the unpublished 2011 SECC caste data. Risks include reification of identity and a pure percentage war that forgets class, gender, and Ambedkar’s horizon of annihilation. A democratic census would publish usable aggregates while protecting persons and keeping constitutional individual rights at the centre.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation
Indian Nationalism
The 73rd and 74th Amendments reserved local seats for women, which is a structural opening, not yet equal participation. Sarpanch-pati proxy rule, unpaid care, and a male bureaucracy remain the everyday patriarchal impediments. Caste and class decide which women can act; Dalit women office-holders face additional violence and veto. Thin devolution of money and staff makes many local offices ceremonial, so participation has no policy content. Parties and seat rotation often transfer the reserved ticket to a household rather than building a woman’s public career.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Parliamentary Committees are a strong tool of Parliamentary Democracy. It provides for the opportunity for cross-pollination of ideas among members of the Parliament. Discuss
Indian Nationalism
Parliamentary committees are the efficient working form of Indian parliamentary democracy, where bills, grants, and CAG reports can be examined in detail. Department-related Standing Committees mix Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members across ministries; PAC, Estimates, and COPU are the financial core. Cross-pollination happens because the whip is weaker, witnesses bring expertise, and members may agree on technical text they would never concede in the well of the House. The tool fails when bills are not referred, demands are guillotined, or ordinances replace debate. Committees strengthen democracy only if the House and the executive treat their reports as more than annual ritual.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.