Revision summary
The anti-arrack movement in Andhra Pradesh was a rural women’s campaign against cheap liquor shops and their social effects. Women picketed, used literacy networks, and made domestic violence and lost wages into a public issue. The state was both target and accomplice because excise revenue and contractors were involved. Governments responded with bans that were later weakened, showing both agenda power and structural limits. The movement is a clear Indian illustration that household injury can become political action.
Model answer
Introduction
The anti-arrack movement in Andhra Pradesh in the early 1990s was a mass campaign, led largely by rural women, against the sale and consumption of cheap liquor. It showed women as political actors in villages, not only as a vote bank. The household’s injury became a public demand on the state.
Body
What women did
Women in Nellore and then across districts organised pickets of arrack shops, burnt packets, held night vigils, and used literacy and sangham networks that had grown around adult education. They named domestic violence, wasted wages, and indebtedness as effects of a state-linked liquor economy. The demand was prohibition or strict control, and an end to the revenue logic that treated arrack as a fiscal good.
The movement entered party competition. Governments announced bans and later diluted them, which showed both the power of women’s collective action and the limits of a demand that cut state revenue and contractor interest. Pressure-group politics here was not an urban lobby. It was neighbourhood organisation.
Political meaning
- The episode illustrates that the personal is political: the kitchen and the wage packet were already organised by excise policy. It also illustrates Gramsci’s civil society: women built a counter-common-sense against official development talk. Later women’s reservation in panchayats after the 73rd Amendment gave some of the same actors an institutional forum, including the Gram Sabha. The note should not claim a permanent prohibition victory. It should claim a permanent lesson: rural women can set the agenda of the state.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD AA[Anti-arrack] --> W[Rural women organise] W --> SH[Shops and state revenue] W --> H[Household violence and wages] AA --> P[Party and prohibition politics] AA --> GS[Later panchayat forums]
Conclusion
Women’s role in the anti-arrack movement was to organise, to name liquor as a public injury, and to force parties to respond. The movement politicised the household without waiting for permission from elite feminism. Its unfinished policy result does not cancel that political fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How far do you agree that the Directive Principles of State Policy are more fundamental than the Fundamental Rights in meeting socio-economic justice as mentioned in the Preamble of the Constitution?
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Was this only a temperance campaign?
Temperance was the surface. The political content was control over wages, violence, and a state that funded itself from women’s injury.
-
Did it succeed?
It succeeded in setting the agenda and forcing policy announcements. Lasting prohibition was not secured. Success in political theory includes the making of new public actors.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly. -
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Relevance of the Legislative Council. -
2024 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of environmental movements in shaping environmental governance in India. -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.