Revision summary
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Model answer
Introduction
John Locke in the Two Treatises of Government treats government as a trust created by consent to protect life, liberty, and estate. Revolution is not a taste for disorder. It is the residual right of the people when that trust is dissolved by arbitrary power.
Body
The trust and its breach
In the state of nature people have natural law but lack an impartial judge. They form political society and set a legislature that must rule by standing law. The executive is a fiduciary power. If the prince or the legislature acts contrary to the trust — by arbitrary taxation, by destroying the legislature, by placing the people under a foreign power, or by a long train of abuses — government is dissolved. Power returns to the community.
Locke insists that this is not a licence for every discontent. Private force against a lawful magistrate is not the same as the people acting when the constitution is already broken. The appeal is to heaven only when no earthly judge remains. Filmer’s patriarchal kingship is rejected because no one is born the property of a ruler.
Political meaning
The argument armed 1688 and later Jefferson’s 1776 claim that a people may alter a government destructive of rights. It also limits revolution: the end is the restoration of law and property, not a war of all against all. Hobbes feared that right; Locke made it the last check on tyranny. Later constitutional democracy regularises the same idea as elections, higher law, and removable rulers.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Government as trust] --> C[Consent and standing law] T --> B[Breach: arbitrary power] B --> R[People resume power] R --> L[New legislature under rights]
Conclusion
Locke’s view of revolution is the people’s right to resume original power when rulers destroy the trust of consent, law, and rights. It is a constitutional last resort, not a theory of permanent insurrection. Western bills of rights still speak in that language.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Decline of Liberalism.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Locke encourage frequent revolution?
No. He argued that people endure much before they rise, and that the right is triggered by a dissolved constitution, not by ordinary policy disagreement.
-
How does this differ from Hobbes?
Hobbes made sovereign power nearly unlimited once authorised, because the alternative is the state of war. Locke kept a residual popular right against a trustee who becomes a tyrant.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science. -
2024 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Decline of Liberalism. -
2024 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term "political" with appropriate illustrations. -
2024 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Dharmashastra presents a duty-centric worldview for individuals and communities. Comment. -
2024 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine Plato's theory of Forms. -
2024 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The blueprint of Gram Swaraj is the key to understanding the Gandhian perspective on planning. Discuss. -
2024 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically assess the role of pressure groups in the decision-making process of the government. -
2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Normative approach in Political Science.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Decline of Liberalism.
Political Theory
Liberalism’s core is equal individual rights, limited government, and a civil society distinct from the state. Decline has been claimed in the face of world war, fascism, Stalinism, the social question, and contemporary illiberal majorities. Laski, Schmitt, and communitarians named different failures of classical or procedural liberalism. Rawls, constitutional basic-structure doctrine, and Habermas show a reconstruction rather than a simple death. Decline is a recurring crisis diagnosis; the vocabulary of rights against arbitrary power remains in use.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.