Revision summary
Environmental governance in India is the official system for allocating forests, water, land, and pollution costs. Chipko politicised forest felling as a livelihood and women’s issue and weakened a purely contractor-and-department model. Narmada contested large dams, displacement, and rehabilitation, forcing public justification even when the project proceeded. Laws, EIA hearings, the NGT, constitutional environmental duties, and Gram Sabha-related rights are institutional responses to movement pressure. The development state was not replaced; it was compelled to add procedures and to argue in public, which is the movements’ principal shaping effect.
Model answer
Introduction
Environmental governance is the set of rules, agencies, and practices that decide who may use land, forest, water, and air, and who bears the cost. In India that governance was long a development-state affair: dams, mines, and forest departments in the lineage of colonial reservation and Nehru’s plans. Environmental movements forced that affair into public argument. They did not replace the state. They changed what the state had to justify.
Body
Chipko and the forest public
The Chipko movement in the Uttarakhand Himalaya in the 1970s made forest policy a question of local livelihood, not only of timber contracts. Villagers, including women, hugged trees and demanded a say in felling. The movement linked Gandhi’s local swaraj to ecology. It influenced later forest law debates, joint forest management talk, and the idea that hill women are environmental actors. Governance shifted from a purely departmental file to a recognised local claim, even when implementation remained uneven.
Narmada and the large-dam state
The Narmada Bachao Andolan contested displacement, the meaning of public purpose, and the quality of rehabilitation in the Sardar Sarovar and related projects. It used satyagraha, research, international advocacy, and the Supreme Court. The Court in 2000 allowed the dam to proceed under conditions, which showed both the reach and the limit of movement litigation. Environmental governance absorbed new rituals: environmental impact assessment, public hearings, and rehabilitation policies. It did not abandon the large-project model. The movement still changed the decision process. A dam now has to answer in public, which is a Habermas-like demand inserted into a planning state.
Other pressures and institutional response
Silent Valley, anti-mining struggles, urban clean-air litigation, and coastal protests similarly pulled ministries and courts. The 42nd Amendment’s environmental duties, Articles 48A and 51A(g), the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Forest Conservation Act, the National Green Tribunal, and EIA notifications are the legal sediment of crisis and mobilisation, not only of expert design. Pressure groups and scientists entered clearance committees. Federal tension appeared: states want projects; local communities want veto or voice. The Gram Sabha under the 73rd Amendment and later forest-rights legislation gave a statutory hook for local environmental will, which the question on Gram Sabha also names.
How far
Movements shaped governance by agenda-setting, by producing knowledge that official plans omitted, and by forcing procedures of hearing and clearance. They did not produce a consistently ecological state. Clearances can be ritual. Violence against activists continues. Growth politics still ranks high. The honest discussion is that environmental governance in India is a contested field that movements opened. Chipko and Narmada are the type-cases. The Planning Commission’s successor still thinks in projects; it must now do so under a louder local and judicial check.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD EM[Environmental movements] --> CH[Chipko forests] EM --> NA[Narmada dams] EM --> LAW[EPA EIA NGT] EM --> LOC[Gram Sabha / local voice] ST[Development state] --> LAW
Conclusion
Environmental movements made forests, rivers, and displacement into national political issues and pushed the state toward assessment, hearings, tribunals, and local statutory voice. Chipko and Narmada show the pattern. Governance was reshaped as procedure and as argument, not as a complete change of development model. That partial reshaping is still a major political fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Did the Supreme Court always side with movements?
No. Narmada showed the Court balancing development and rights, often allowing projects with conditions. Courts are part of governance, not a substitute for movements.
-
Is this the same as Gandhian planning?
Chipko drew on Gandhian localism. Official environmental governance remains inside a national development state. The overlap is the claim that locality must be heard.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly. -
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Relevance of the Legislative Council. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement. -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.