Revision summary
Relative deprivation is the perceived gap between a group’s entitlement and its actual share, relative to others or to its past. Gurr linked that gap to political violence; ethnicity supplies a ready we–they organisation of the grievance. Conflict often follows blocked mobility or lost rank more than shared absolute poverty. Indian language and job conflicts, some insurgencies, and cases such as Sri Lanka illustrate the pattern. Elite strategy, state bias, and security dilemmas also matter; relative deprivation is a major source, not the only one.
Model answer
Introduction
Relative deprivation is the gap between what a group believes it is entitled to and what it actually receives, measured against another group or against its own past. Ted Gurr made the idea central to the study of rebellion. The statement that it is a major source of ethnic conflict is strong and largely right, provided it is not treated as the only source.
Body
From comparison to conflict
- Ethnic identity supplies a we–they map. Relative deprivation supplies the grievance: we have less office, less land, less respect, or less security than they do, or less than we had. Political entrepreneurs then organise fear and hope. Dahl’s polyarchy can absorb some of this through bargains. If the state is seen as captured by one ethnic bloc, legitimacy fails and obligation to a common authority weakens.
Absolute poverty alone does not always produce ethnic war. Groups that are poor together may not mobilise as ethnic enemies. Groups that are rising but blocked, or falling after privilege, often do. That is the relative in the term.
Examples
In India, language and job competition in states, the demand for reorganisation, and later caste-and-community conflicts over reservations show relative deprivation among groups who compare educational and public-employment shares. Kashmiri and some North-Eastern insurgencies mixed secessionist nationalism with the sense of political and economic slight. Hindu–Muslim violence has often followed rumours of displacement in towns where one community’s market position seemed to threaten another’s. Sri Lanka’s Tamil–Sinhala conflict followed competitive claims over language, university places, and the state. Northern Ireland and the former Yugoslavia showed similar comparison of status after political change.
Ambedkar’s account of caste is related but not identical: graded inequality can produce deprivation that is absolute as well as relative. Ethnic conflict in the North-East also involves land, insurgency networks, and Centre–state militarisation, which are not only feelings of gap.
Elaborate, do not reduce
- Relative deprivation is major because it explains timing: conflict often rises when expectations rise faster than delivery, or when a previously dominant group loses rank. It does not erase elite manipulation, colonial classifications, or security dilemmas. Gramsci would add that hegemony can keep deprivation from becoming conflict until a crisis of authority. A full elaboration therefore uses Gurr’s mechanism, illustrates it, and keeps a residual list of other causes.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD RD[Relative deprivation] --> CMP[Comparison of shares] CMP --> GR[Ethnic grievance] GR --> ENT[Political entrepreneurs] ENT --> CF[Ethnic conflict] OTH[Other causes] --> CF
Conclusion
Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict because groups act on comparisons of entitlement and share, not only on absolute misery. Indian and comparative cases show the mechanism. Other causes remain. The statement should be accepted as a leading explanation, not as a complete one.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is every reservation conflict ethnic conflict?
Caste and community conflicts over quotas are often relative-deprivation conflicts over public goods. Whether they are ‘ethnic’ depends on how groups are named; the mechanism of comparison is the same.
-
Can democracy reduce this source?
Power-sharing, fair recruitment, and credible courts can lower the gap or make it negotiable. If democracy is winner-take-all along ethnic lines, it can raise the gap.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Objective Resolution of the Constituent Assembly. -
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Relevance of the Legislative Council. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement. -
2024 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of environmental movements in shaping environmental governance in India. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.