Revision summary
Social capital is trust and networks; for women it makes legal rights usable. NRLM, Kudumbashree, Jeevika, SEWA and reserved panchayat chairs are Indian examples. Bonding kin networks can constrain; bridging groups can open credit and voice. Courts and the 106th Amendment change rules; SHGs and ASHA cadres change practice. Networks complement the State; they do not replace land title, wages or policing.
Model answer
Introduction
Social capital is the trust, networks and norms that let people act together. For women in India it is the neighbour who watches a child, the self-help group that co-signs a loan, the WhatsApp circle that names a violent husband, and the panchayat quorum that is no longer only male. Law gives a right. Social capital is often what makes the right usable.
Body
Complement, not substitute
Formal tools — Articles 14, 15 and 16, the 73rd Amendment’s reserved chairs, the 106th Amendment (2023) for one-third of Lok Sabha and the Assemblies, POSH, PMMVY, NRLM / Mission Shakti, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao — change the rules. They do not automatically change who speaks in a village meeting. Putnam’s language of bonding and bridging capital is useful: a caste-kin circle can trap a woman (bonding that polices), while a mixed SHG or a nurses’ union can open a labour market (bridging).
Kudumbashree in Kerala, Jeevika in Bihar, SEWA in Gujarat, and countless NRLM groups show savings, bank linkage and a public identity that a lone BPL card does not. Pradhan women in reserved panchayats, studied since the 1990s, often begin as proxies and sometimes become principals — the shift is social capital accumulating in office. Anganwadi and ASHA networks are the State’s own female social capital, which COVID-19 made visible.
Equity
Gender equity needs assets and voice. SHG credit without land title still leaves the paradox of labour without ownership. Courts have added pieces: Vineeta Sharma on coparcenary, Joseph Shine on adultery law, Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya on short-service women officers, Nari Shakti in the services. None of these works in a hamlet where no woman will witness for another at the thana. That witness is social capital.
- Limits: microcredit can become micro-debt. Church, caste sabha and khap are also women’s networks with conservative norms. FCRA and political suspicion of NGOs can thin the bridging organisations that train panchayat women. Social capital complements empowerment when the State remains the guarantor of land, police and schools. It does not replace a functioning crèche or a charge sheet.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Law and schemes] --> R[Rights on paper] S[SHG panchayat ASHA] --> U[Usable rights] R --> U U --> E[Voice and assets]
Conclusion
Women’s groups, reserved local office and care-worker cadres turn legal equality into daily coordination. They advance equity when they bridge beyond kin. They cannot be a substitute for titles, wages and a responsive police station.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
e-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is an SHG enough for empowerment?
It is a start for credit and meeting. Equity still needs property, wages, safety and a say in the panchayat budget.
-
Can social capital be regressive?
Yes. Caste panchayats and honour networks are social capital with a gender penalty. The test is whether the network expands a woman’s exit options.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021. -
2025 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly after the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019. Briefly describe the powers and functions of the Assembly of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. -
2025 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks
"With the waning of globalization, post-Cold War world is becoming a site of sovereign nationalism." Elucidate. -
2025 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India. -
2025 · Q17 · GS II · 15 marks
"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate. -
2025 · Q18 · GS II · 15 marks
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue. -
2024 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
"The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety." Comment. -
2024 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the 'corrupt practices' for the purpose of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Analyze whether the increase in the assets of the legislators and/or their associates, disproportionate to their known sources of income, would constitute 'undue influence' and consequently a corrupt practice.
Representation of the People Act
Section 123 RPA lists corrupt practices for election petitions: bribery, undue influence, communal appeal, false statements, booth capturing and related heads. Undue influence is interference with the free exercise of an electoral right, not every unfair gain. ADR and PUCL made asset affidavits part of an informed vote; false disclosure can be litigated. A legislator’s unexplained wealth is primarily a Prevention of Corruption Act and ethics issue. It is not, by itself, undue influence under the 1951 Act unless tied to bribery or intimidation of electors.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 10 marks
Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021.
Governance and Policy
Articles 323A and 323B create tribunals for mass specialised disputes; L. Chandra Kumar keeps High Court judicial review. The need is expertise and volume, not ouster of courts. The Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, abolished several appellate bodies and restated short tenure and a high minimum age. Madras Bar Association cases (2020–21) insisted on CJI-linked selection and real tenure for judicial members. Rationalisation reduced forums; it did not, by itself, produce independent or faster justice.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 10 marks
Compare and contrast the President's power to pardon in India and in the USA. Are there any limits to it in both the countries? What are 'preemptive pardons'?
Indian Constitution
Article 72 (and 161) are exercised on aid and advice; Maru Ram, Kehar Singh, Epuru Sudhakar and Shatrughan Chauhan frame Indian limits and delay. The US Article II pardon is personal, federal-only, and barred in impeachment. Judicial review is stronger in India; political cost is the main US brake. A preemptive pardon forgives before conviction, as in Ford–Nixon. India has no working doctrine of preemptive pardon for the untried.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.