Revision summary
CSR is the firm’s claimed duty beyond profit to community and nature. Climate and toxicity make that duty relevant because firms produce much of the harm. India’s section 135 and ESG reporting institutionalise spending and disclosure. Bhopal and offshoring of dirt show the limit of voluntary virtue. Regulation and a change in the energy base remain the core response.
Model answer
Introduction
Corporate social responsibility is the claim that firms have duties beyond profit to workers, communities, and nature. In a world of climate disruption, toxic waste, and biodiversity loss, that claim is relevant as a limited tool. It is not a substitute for public regulation of production.
Body
Why it is relevant
- Environmental crises are produced in large part by industrial and extractive firms, so the same organisations are asked to internalise costs they once dumped.
- Archie Carroll’s pyramid placed legal and ethical duties beside philanthropy. Climate risk now sits inside the economic duty itself, because stranded assets and disasters hit the balance sheet.
- India’s Companies Act, 2013, section 135, made a spending mandate for large companies, and Schedule VII lists environment among eligible heads.
- The United Nations Global Compact and later ESG reporting give a common language for investors to compare firms.
Limits in a crisis
- CSR can be a public-relations budget beside a polluting core, which the Bhopal gas disaster of 1984 still illustrates as a failure of industrial duty.
- Voluntary codes do not bind competitors. A firm that cuts emissions can lose market share if law does not bind the rest.
- Andre Gunder Frank’s map of core and periphery still matters: dirty processes move to weaker regulators while CSR reports are written at headquarters.
- Marx’s point on surplus remains: a firm exists to accumulate. CSR does not abolish that drive.
Examination
- Relevant as disclosure, local repair, and a political language that communities can use in court and in the press.
- Insufficient as the main response to climate and toxicity, which need state standards, liability, and a change in the energy base.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Firm accumulation] --> H[Environmental harm] C[CSR ESG mandate] --> R[Report repair spend] H --> R L[Public regulation] --> H R --> X[Limited without law]
Conclusion
CSR is relevant in environmental crisis because firms are central producers of harm and can be pressed to report and repair. It is not sufficient, because voluntary spending cannot replace binding rules and a change in accumulation. Use it as one lever beside law, not as the solution.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How is civil society useful in deepening the roots of democracy?
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Does section 135 stop pollution?
It mandates spending and reporting for eligible firms. Pollution control still depends on environmental law and enforcement.
-
Is ESG the same as CSR?
ESG is mainly an investor reporting frame. CSR is a broader duty talk, including philanthropy and local projects.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you assess the changing patterns in kinship relations in societies today? -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices -
2023 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does women's education help to eradicate patriarchal discriminations? Reflect with illustrations
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the distinctiveness of the feminist method of social research? Comment
Sociology as Science
Feminist method starts from women’s everyday work and treats gender as power, not as an extra variable. Smith, Harding, Oakley, and Collins made standpoint, reflexivity, and intersection the core tools. It criticises Durkheim-style distance that treated the male public actor as the normal subject. Indian care work, dowry, and the double day show what occupation surveys miss. The method stays empirical. It is not a substitute for evidence.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the relationship between sociology and political science
Sociology as Science
Both disciplines study power. Political science centres the state. Sociology centres groups and everyday domination. Marx, Weber, Pareto, Michels, and Mills already joined class, party, and elite. Durkheim and Parsons treated the polity as part of a wider social system. Indian elections, Mandal, and civil society research fail if the two fields are sealed. The relation is complementary, not a hierarchy of sciences.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life?
Sociology
Goffman reads everyday life as performance with front and back regions, teams, and face-work. The point is the shared definition of the situation, not a claim that all talk is false. Mead’s Me is made public on this stage. Asylums shows what happens when the back region is removed. The method is strong on encounters and weak as a full theory of class and the state.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.