Revision summary
Kinship is relatedness through descent, marriage, and care, not only a joint house. Parsons’s isolated nuclear family does not describe Indian change. Later marriage, migration, divorce, and new parenthood forms diversify households. David Morgan’s practices and Karve’s regional systems are better tools than Morgan’s old stages. Gendered care and caste endogamy continue inside the new household types.
Model answer
Introduction
Kinship is the organised recognition of relatedness through descent, marriage, and care. Patterns today are changing in law, residence, and everyday practice, but they are not disappearing. The assessment must name what is new without announcing the end of the family.
Body
What older models assumed
- Lewis Henry Morgan treated kinship as a classificatory system tied to stages of society. That evolutionary ladder is no longer used as a law of progress.
- Later anthropology, including Claude Levi-Strauss, treated alliance and the exchange of spouses as structure.
- Talcott Parsons described the isolated nuclear family as the form that fitted industrial society in the United States.
- Irawati Karve mapped North and South Indian kinship as different regional systems of descent, marriage, and household.
Patterns now visible
- Later marriage, lower fertility, and longer life change the span of generations living at once.
- Dual-earner households, migration, and urban housing shrink co-residence of joint kin without ending remittance and ritual obligation.
- Divorce, remarriage, single-parent households, and live-in arrangements, recognised in some Indian judgments, multiply forms of household.
- Chosen kin and friendship care appear where marriage is delayed or refused.
- David Morgan’s family practices shift attention from a fixed group to the activities of calling, visiting, and caring that make relatedness.
- Same-sex partnerships and assisted reproduction disturb the old identity of blood, marriage, and parenthood.
Indian specificities
- Joint household ideology remains strong even when brothers live in different cities and share a village house at rites.
- Gotra, clan, and caste endogamy still organise a large share of marriages, now with matrimonial sites as a new market.
- Matrilineal pockets such as the Khasi and the Nair past show that change is not a single path from joint to nuclear.
- A. M. Shah warned against treating the joint family as a simple census headcount of co-residence.
Assessment
- The direction is toward more diverse households and more negotiated practice, not toward the death of kinship.
- Gender remains central: care still falls heavily on women even when the chart of the household looks nuclear.
- Class splits the pattern. Secure professionals buy privacy. Migrant labour depends on village kin as social security.
- Global media spread companionate marriage ideals. Property and honour continue to discipline those ideals.
How to study the change
- Combine census household type with Morgan’s practices and with Karve’s regional map.
- Do not use Parsons’s isolated nuclear family as the Indian destination.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Kinship] --> D[Descent marriage care] D --> H[Diverse households] M[Migration dual earning] --> H P[Morgan family practices] --> H C[Caste endogamy honour] --> L[Continuity] H --> A[Change with continuity]
Conclusion
Kinship today is more diverse in household form, more stretched by migration, and more visible as practice than as a single joint or nuclear type. Morgan’s evolutionary stages do not explain this. Regional systems, gender, and class do. Kinship is changing in pattern. It is not finished as a social institution.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q4(a)). View answer →
-
Has the Indian joint family ended?
Co-residence has declined in many cities. Ritual, property, and care obligations often continue across houses.
-
Is kinship only biology?
No. Law, marriage rules, and care practices make relatedness. Assisted reproduction makes that visible.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in a world marked by increasing environmental crises -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices -
2023 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does women's education help to eradicate patriarchal discriminations? Reflect with illustrations
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.