Revision summary
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Model answer
Introduction
- India’s Bangladesh policy after 2009 rested on a close bet on Sheikh Hasina: security cooperation against northeast insurgents, transit, power trade, and a managed border. That bet was jolted when Hasina left office in August 2024 and an interim order under Muhammad Yunus began to reopen the external field. China’s growing footprint is both cause and beneficiary of that shift. India’s leverage in Dhaka has weakened. It has not vanished.
Body
The tangible shift
- Beijing already sat in Bangladesh’s infrastructure: bridges, power plants, and Belt and Road credit. After 2024, political permission for a more visible China — defence conversation, extra projects, and a less embarrassed equidistance — increased. For a smaller state, omni-enmeshment is rational: play India and China, as Nepal and Sri Lanka have. Reports of Chinese interest in dual-use facilities and of Dhaka’s wish to diversify arms away from a single neighbour are the security reading. The Teesta water file, long stalled, became a symbol of Indian delay that China offered, rhetorically, to fill with projects.
Why Indian leverage thinned
Leverage was personalised around Awami League networks and around India’s role as the 1971 midwife. It under-priced domestic anger: jobless youth, alleged electoral closure, and the optics of Delhi as a patron. A large bilateral trade surplus in India’s favour, occasional border killings, and CAA–NRC sensitivities among Bangladeshi Muslims were stored grievances. When the regime broke, those grievances became foreign policy. China does not carry 1971’s emotional debt; it carries cash and a UN veto.
Comment
The statement is largely right as a trend, overstated as a verdict. India remains the market, the electricity grid partner, the transit geography to the northeast, and the cultural neighbour. Delhi still holds visas, river data, and the capacity to spoil. A hyper-realist over-reaction would push Dhaka further east. A smarter line is Neighbourhood First with less regime-personality: water-sharing, trade access, and quiet security coordination that does not look like tutelage. China’s rise in the Bay is real. India’s loss is political capital, not the map.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Hasina-era bet] --> S[Shock 2024] S --> C[China footprint] S --> L[Thinner Indian leverage] G[Geography grids rivers] --> I[Residual Indian cards]
Conclusion
China’s opening in a post-Hasina Bangladesh has cut India’s privileged access. Geography, grids and markets still give Delhi cards. Leverage is weaker because it was too personal and too slow on water and trade dignity. It is not yet a lost neighbourhood.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Would you agree with the contention that India's inclination to lean on a 'more aggressive hyper-realist posture' has gained a new momentum in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist strike? Comment.
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Has Bangladesh ‘switched camps’?
No. It is widening options. Camp-switch language is a Delhi anxiety, not a Dhaka communiqué.
-
Does 1971 still matter?
As memory, yes, especially among some elites. As a blank cheque for Indian influence, 2024 showed it does not.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Despite deep ties, India's relations with Sri Lanka have seen strains due to China's growing influence in Sri Lanka through investments and economic dominance. Analyse. -
2024 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples. -
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2023 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss -
2023 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What steps has India taken to regain its foothold in Afghanistan since the Taliban has taken over the country in August 2021? -
2023 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the significance of "West Asia Quad" in the light of India's 'Look West' policy -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.