Revision summary
India kept autonomy and added many partnerships at once. The US civil nuclear path and later defence logistics marked a new Western channel. Act East, BIMSTEC, and a stalled SAARC reshaped the neighbourhood method. China’s rise and the Quad moved policy toward the Indo-Pacific. G20 and Global South summits updated older NAM claims for a growth-centred State.
Model answer
Introduction
India’s 21st-century foreign policy kept strategic autonomy and added multi-alignment, economic statecraft, and a harder maritime view of China. The change is of mix and of partners, not a simple drop of NAM language.
Body
From non-alignment as centre to multi-alignment
- The Cold War NAM core remains a vocabulary. Practice added simultaneous work with the United States, Russia, the European Union, Japan, and the Global South.
- The 2008 India–United States civil nuclear path and later logistics and foundational agreements showed a strategic partnership that 20th-century non-alignment had not contained.
- Russia remained a defence and energy partner even as its share of new arms orders fell.
Neighbourhood and East
- Neighbourhood First and Act East replaced a thinner Look East slogan with connectivity, BIMSTEC, and ASEAN-centred diplomacy.
- SAARC stalled. Sub-regional and trans-regional clubs grew.
China, Quad, and the sea
- Border crises, including 2020 in eastern Ladakh, moved China from a manageable rivalry toward a central military problem.
- The Quad’s revival, Malabar exercises, and Indo-Pacific language placed India in a maritime balancing set without a NATO treaty.
- Offensive-realist readings of Chinese power and defensive-realist caution about over-alignment both appear in official practice.
Global South and domestic link
- Energy, diaspora, and trade became first-order tools. G20 presidency in 2023 and Voice of Global South diplomacy updated NAM-era claims.
- Foreign policy is now sold more openly as a support to growth, technology, and Indian-origin communities abroad.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD O[20th century NAM core] --> M[Multi-alignment] M --> Q[Quad US Japan] M --> R[Russia energy arms] M --> S[Global South G20]
Conclusion
The major 21st-century changes are multi-alignment, a tighter economic and diaspora policy, Act East, and a maritime-plus-border response to China. Autonomy is still the stated doctrine. The partner set is wider than the 20th-century NAM map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Did India abandon non-alignment in this century?
It abandoned exclusive reliance on a NAM-centred map. It did not join a military alliance. Officials prefer multi-alignment or strategic autonomy.
-
Is the Quad the whole of the change?
No. Energy with the Middle East, Russia oil after 2022, and Africa diplomacy are also major 21st-century files.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Despite deep ties, India's relations with Sri Lanka have seen strains due to China's growing influence in Sri Lanka through investments and economic dominance. Analyse. -
2023 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss -
2023 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What steps has India taken to regain its foothold in Afghanistan since the Taliban has taken over the country in August 2021? -
2023 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the significance of "West Asia Quad" in the light of India's 'Look West' policy -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.