Revision summary
The 2025 Pahalgam attack on tourists in Kashmir invited a harder Indian security response. Hyper-realism here means more public force, isolation of Pakistan-based terror, and refusal of U.S. Kashmir mediation. The contention is partly right: the groove since Balakot already ran that way and Pahalgam accelerated it. It is not total: Russia, the Quad, the EU and economic diplomacy remain other registers. Agree partially — acceleration, not a new religion of offensive realism.
Model answer
Introduction
The Pahalgam terrorist strike of 2025 — tourists killed in the Baisaran meadows of Kashmir — was designed to smear India’s security claim in the Valley and to invite a spectacle of revenge. The contention that India then leaned harder into a hyper-realist posture is plausible. It is not the whole of Indian foreign policy. A 10-mark comment should agree in part.
Body
What hyper-realism means here
In theory, realism already expects self-help. Hyper-realism, in the Indian debate, means a thicker willingness to use cross-border force, public military signalling, and a lower patience for third-party sermons — Kautilya’s danda as first language, Mearsheimer’s offensive logic in a nuclear neighbourhood. After Pulwama–Balakot (2019) and the 2020s pattern of naming Pakistan-based groups without the old composite-dialogue theatre, Pahalgam fitted an existing groove: punish, isolate, and refuse U.S. mediation on Kashmir as a favour.
Where the contention is right
Domestic politics after mass-casualty terror rewards visible toughness. Forces, intelligence, and diplomatic demarches harden together. India can tighten the Indus conversation, the FATF spotlight, and visa and sporting isolation while keeping kinetic options on the table. That is a more aggressive mix than the 1990s ‘strategic restraint’ Stephen Cohen described. Jaishankar’s energetic diplomacy is not pacifism; it is activity in the service of a harder core.
Where it is only partial
India did not become a one-note offensive realist. It still buys oil and arms logic from Russia while courting the United States in the Quad; it still talks Indo-Pacific public goods; it still wants EU capital. Hyper-realism toward one adversary can sit beside institutionalism toward others. Permanent crisis also has costs: tourism in Kashmir, investment, and the risk of two-front stress with China on the LAC. Delhi has not emptied the toolbox of talks, covert quiet, and multilateral lawfare.
Pahalgam accelerated a posture already in motion since 2016–19. It did not found a new school. Agreement should be partial, not a conversion story.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Pahalgam 2025] --> H[Harder signalling] H --> K[Kinetic and isolate] H --> R[Still multi-aligned] R --> A[Partial not total hyper-realism]
Conclusion
After Pahalgam, India looked more hyper-realist because terror politics punishes hesitation. The lean is real toward Pakistan-facing force and refusal of mediation. It is not the sum of a foreign policy that still needs markets, Russia, the U.S. and a usable Valley.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is hyper-realism the same as nuclear first use?
No. It is a posture of conventional and diplomatic hardness. India’s official nuclear doctrine remains a separate, still-declared file.
-
Does toughness work against terrorism?
It can raise costs and satisfy domestic audiences. It does not, by itself, end recruitment or third-party safe havens. That is why partial agreement is honest.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment. -
2025 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises. -
2025 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights. -
2025 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The world currently has been in the throes of a twin process of 'democratic backsliding' and 'democratic backlash'. How would you explain this paradox? -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
How successful has the 'ASEAN Plus Three' been in addressing regional problems? Support your answer with specific examples -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
"Trump's return to the White House is a jolt to push the European Union to invest in its own defence and economic and technological revival." Comment -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.