Revision summary
Look West treats the Gulf and Israel as central to energy, labour, and investment. I2U2 is India, Israel, UAE, and the United States in a 2022 project grouping. Food parks and clean energy are the public work, not a mutual-defence treaty. Abraham Accords politics made the table easier. Iran and Palestine remain outside its scope and still constrain India’s full West Asia map.
Model answer
Introduction
I2U2 groups India, Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the United States. It is the so-called West Asia Quad. Look West, or Think West, is India’s effort to treat the Gulf and Israel as seriously as Act East treats ASEAN. I2U2 is a project arm of that turn, not a NATO in the Gulf.
Body
Look West
- Energy imports, Indian workers in the Gulf, remittances, and later defence and investment with the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Israel made West Asia a core interest, not a transit zone.
- The Abraham Accords reduced the cost of India dealing openly with Israel and Gulf States at the same table.
- Chabahar and Iran remained a parallel, harder file, which is why Look West is a set, not a single alliance.
What I2U2 does
- Announced in 2022, it has worked on food parks, hybrid energy, and water and space-related cooperation rather than on a joint army.
- It uses US technology, Gulf capital, Israeli innovation, and Indian scale and food demand.
- For India it is economic statecraft and status among West Asian partners, consistent with multi-alignment.
What it is not
- It is not a substitute for NAM or for Global South diplomacy. Several NAM States oppose Israeli policy. India separates I2U2 projects from UN votes that still use older language.
- It does not resolve Palestine, Yemen, or Iran. Tehran reads the geometry as unfriendly, which feeds the 7(c) challenge.
- It cannot police the Strait of Hormuz by itself. US and local militaries still dominate hard security.
Fit with theory
- Keohane’s clubs: a small regime for specific goods. Mitrany’s function: food and energy tasks first.
- Mearsheimer’s map: the United States knitting partners on China’s western approaches and on Iran. India participates where projects serve growth.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LW[Look West energy diaspora] --> I2[I2U2 2022] I2 --> P[Food energy water projects] IR[Iran Palestine files] -.not solved.-> I2
Conclusion
I2U2 is a functional West Asian club that fits India’s Look West bet on Gulf capital, Israeli technology, and US partnership. It extends multi-alignment into projects. It does not replace Iran policy, Palestinian diplomacy, or Indian labour protection in the Gulf.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q5(a)). View answer →
-
Is I2U2 the same as the Indo-Pacific Quad?
No. Membership and tasks differ. The nickname West Asia Quad is journalistic. There is no merged military command.
-
Does I2U2 end India’s Iran ties?
It complicates them. Chabahar still exists as a separate bet. India has not chosen a single West Asian camp.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Despite deep ties, India's relations with Sri Lanka have seen strains due to China's growing influence in Sri Lanka through investments and economic dominance. Analyse. -
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2023 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"India's Nuclear policy is deeply influenced by its cultural beliefs and the pragmatic approach of its foreign policy." Discuss -
2023 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What steps has India taken to regain its foothold in Afghanistan since the Taliban has taken over the country in August 2021? -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.