Revision summary
The Objective Resolution, moved by Nehru on 13 December 1946, stated the aims of the Constitution before detailed drafting. It promised a sovereign republic, popular sovereignty, justice, equality, freedom, and safeguards for minorities, tribes, and depressed classes. The Preamble is its condensed public form. Parts III and IV give the aims legal and programmatic shape. Kesavananda used the Preamble as a guide to what Parliament may not destroy.
Model answer
Introduction
The Objective Resolution was the Constituent Assembly’s statement of purpose for the Constitution. Jawaharlal Nehru moved it on 13 December 1946. It named sovereignty, republic, justice, equality, and safeguards for minorities before the detailed drafting began.
Body
Content
The Resolution declared India an independent sovereign republic. Power would be derived from the people. The Constitution would guarantee justice — social, economic, and political — equality of status and opportunity, and freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, worship, vocation, association, and action, subject to law and public morality. Minorities, backward and tribal areas, and depressed classes would have adequate safeguards. The integrity of the territory and the just rights of the people on land were affirmed. Relations with the world would rest on peace and the honour of India.
Constitutional afterlife
The Preamble’s language of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity is the Resolution’s child. Ambedkar and the Drafting Committee translated aims into Parts III and IV. Later, Kesavananda Bharati treated the Preamble as a guide to basic structure. The Resolution was not itself law. It was the political theory of the founding: popular sovereignty, a social as well as political republic, and minority protection as part of nationhood rather than as an afterthought.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD OR[Objective Resolution 1946] --> N[Nehru] OR --> P[Preamble] OR --> FR[Parts III and IV] P --> BS[Basic structure guidance]
Conclusion
- Nehru’s Objective Resolution set the aims of the Indian Constitution: a sovereign republic, justice in three dimensions, liberty, equality, and safeguards for the vulnerable. The Preamble and the later basic-structure cases still speak in that register.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Was the Resolution legally binding on the Drafting Committee?
It was a political mandate, not a statute. The Committee still had to turn aims into articles that could be enforced.
-
How does it relate to socio-economic justice?
It named social and economic justice at the start, which is why Directive Principles later claim a founding status beside Fundamental Rights.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Legal remedies in Part III of the Constitution of India. -
2024 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Relevance of the Legislative Council. -
2024 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Women's role in the anti-arrack movement. -
2024 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of environmental movements in shaping environmental governance in India. -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Relative deprivation is a major source of ethnic conflict." Elaborate the statement with relevant examples. -
2024 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Gram Sabha in the Panchayati Raj system is a forum which gives expression to the collective wisdom, aspirations, and the will of the people. Comment. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Fascism displays an ambivalent stance towards parliamentary democracy. Explain -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Environmentalism of the poor.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.