Revision summary
Articles 148–151 and the 1971 Act make the CAG the Union and State auditor. Legality is sanction, appropriation and rule-compliance. Propriety and performance audit test waste and value for money even when vouchers are valid. PAC is the parliamentary partner; major performance reports mixed both functions. Indian audit is overwhelmingly after the spend, so the report must sting. The CAG cannot convict or make policy; it can still refuse to be a mere notary.
Model answer
Introduction
Article 148 makes the Comptroller and Auditor General an independent constitutional officer. The job is not only to ask whether a rupee was spent under a valid appropriation. It is also to ask whether that rupee was spent as a trustee would spend it. That second question is propriety. The quote is the doctrine of Indian audit, not a slogan.
Body
Legality
Without a legality check, public finance is a rumour.
- Peg: The Comptroller and Auditor-General’s (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971, and the audit codes, require audit of receipts and expenditure of the Union and the States.
- Peg: Article 151 carries the report to the President or Governor, then to the House.
- Peg: Legality means sanction, a budget head, a competent authority, and compliance with General Financial Rules and the scheme’s own rules.
Propriety and performance
Propriety asks whether expenditure was excessive, wasteful or avoidable even if each voucher was stamped.
- Peg: Buying a machine that is not needed, or designing a stadium that cannot be used after the games, can be legal and still improper.
- Peg: Performance audit — economy, efficiency, effectiveness — grew from that habit; reports on spectrum allocation, the Commonwealth Games, coal-block allotments and leaking food grain mixed illegal process with waste.
- Peg: The Public Accounts Committee is the parliamentary half of the same function: the CAG supplies the facts; the PAC questions the ministry.
- Peg: India’s CAG is largely post-audit, unlike the old British Comptroller who could stop issue; that makes the sting of the report, after the event, even more important.
Limits
A CAG who only stamps legality is a notary; a CAG who pretends to be a court is something else.
- Peg: The CAG does not convict; an audit figure is not a trial.
- Peg: Policy choice — whether to run a welfare scheme — is the executive’s; how the scheme leaked is the CAG’s.
- Peg: Over-reach into policy is a real risk; under-reach into polite legality is the older vice.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD S[Spend] --> L[Legality] S --> P[Propriety] P --> R[Article 151 report] R --> PAC[Public Accounts Committee] PAC --> H[House] L --> R
Conclusion
Legality keeps spend inside the Appropriation Act. Propriety asks whether the spend was worthy of public trust. Both belong to the CAG; neither turns the office into a court.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Can the CAG stop a payment in advance?
In the main Union system, no. Indian audit is overwhelmingly after the spend, unlike the old British Exchequer control.
-
Is a CAG figure automatically a scam?
No. It is an audit finding. Loss, criminality and policy are for the PAC, investigators and the House.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Comment on the need of administrative tribunals as compared to the court system. Assess the impact of the recent tribunal reforms through rationalization of tribunals made in 2021. -
2024 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Analyse the role of local bodies in providing good governance at local level and bring out the pros and cons of merging the rural local bodies with the urban local bodies. -
2024 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
Public charitable trusts have the potential to make India's development more inclusive as they relate to certain vital public issues. Comment. -
2024 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
The Doctrine of Democratic Governance makes it necessary that the public perception of the integrity and commitment of civil servants becomes absolutely positive. Discuss. -
2023 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India. -
2023 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment. -
2023 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of Presiding Officers of state legislatures in maintaining order and impartiality in conducting legislative work and in facilitating best democratic practices. -
2023 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.
Indian Constitution
Tarkunde, Goswami, Law Commission 170/255 and the Election Commission have long asked for ceilings on party spend, faster petitions, and inner-party democracy. Candidate spend is capped; party spend is not, which is why money still dominates the poll. ADR disclosure and Lily Thomas reduced opacity and the conviction cushion; they did not end criminalisation. ONOE, as framed by the Kovind committee, promises one Model Code freeze, lower cost and less policy freeze. Federal cost: truncated Assemblies, President’s Rule risk, and nationalisation of State polls. Simultaneity is not a substitute for audited party finance and a statutory Code. Reform that works is a package, not a single polling date.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?
Separation of Powers
Lok Adalat is a Legal Services Authorities Act forum: conciliation, award as a decree, generally no appeal. It hears civil matters and compoundable criminal cases, not non-compoundable crime. Arbitration is contractual under the 1996 Act: civil-commercial disputes, Section 34 challenge, no criminal trial. Booz Allen and Vidya Drolia mark what cannot be sent to a private tribunal. Permanent Lok Adalats for public utilities are a statutory hybrid, still not private arbitration. The working distinction is public compromise at little cost versus paid private adjudication.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.