Revision summary
Articles 14, 15(1) and 16 bar sex discrimination; Article 15(3) allows special provisions for women. Directive Principles 39 and 42 and duty 51A(e) set the social-economic frame. Articles 243D and 243T reserve seats for women in local bodies; the 106th Amendment extends reservation to Assemblies and the Lok Sabha after delimitation. Vishaka, Independent Thought, Joseph Shine, Shayara Bano, Vineeta Sharma and Babita Puniya are the main case-law pillars. The constitutional perspective is formal plus substantive equality.
Model answer
Introduction
Gender justice in the Constitution is both equal citizenship and special measures to correct historic disadvantage. The text in Part III, Part IV and the local-government chapters, read with the Court’s equality cases, is the perspective; social practice is still catching up.
Body
Equality and non-discrimination
- Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws; gender justice uses it against arbitrary sex-based classifications.
- Article 15(1) bars discrimination on grounds only of sex; Article 15(3) expressly allows special provisions for women and children, which is the constitutional basis of affirmative action, not a contradiction of equality.
- Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment; reservations and special recruitment for women rest on this cluster with Article 15(3).
- Article 15(4) and later 15(5) and 15(6) address caste and educationally weaker groups; women inside those groups need the sex and the caste lenses together.
Directive Principles, duties and political space
- Article 39(a) and 39(d) direct equal right to livelihood and equal pay for equal work; Article 42 directs just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.
- Article 51A(e) makes it a fundamental duty to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
- Articles 243D and 243T reserve seats for women in Panchayats and municipalities, which is the strongest textual guarantee of political presence below the State legislature.
- The Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, inserts reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, to operate after a census and delimitation; it is the Union-level completion of a demand that the 73rd and 74th Amendments had already met locally.
Personal liberty, dignity and the family
- Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) used Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21, and CEDAW, to lay down workplace sexual-harassment guidelines until the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
- Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) read down the marital-rape exception for wives between 15 and 18, aligning the Indian Penal Code with the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
- Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) struck down the adultery offence as treating the woman as property of the husband.
- Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) held instant triple talaq unconstitutional; Parliament then enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.
- Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020) held that a daughter is a coparcener by birth under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, which is statute read in a gender-just way.
- Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya (2020) and Lt. Col. Nitisha v. Union of India (2021) opened permanent commission and struck facially neutral but discriminatory army criteria.
- Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala (2018) on Sabarimala used freedom of religion against exclusion of women of a certain age; review remains pending, which shows that gender justice and essential religious practice still collide.
Perspective
- Formal equality (same rule for all) is the Article 14 starting point; substantive equality (Article 15(3), reservations, maternity, harassment law) is the second.
- The Constitution therefore does not treat gender justice as charity. It treats it as equal citizenship plus correction of structural sex inequality.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Gender justice] --> E[Arts 14 15 16] G --> S[Art 15(3) special provisions] G --> P[Arts 243D 243T] E --> C[Vishaka Joseph Shine Shayara Bano] S --> C
Conclusion
Constitutional gender justice is Articles 14, 15(1) and 15(3), 16, 39, 42, 51A(e) and local-body reservation, applied in Vishaka, Shayara Bano, Joseph Shine, Vineeta Sharma and the military-commission cases. The perspective is equal citizenship with special measures, not a choice between the two.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by the Union Governments since mid 1990s.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q13). View answer →
-
Does Article 15(3) violate equality?
No. It is an express exception that permits special measures so that equality in Article 14 becomes real for women and children.
-
Is workplace harassment only a statutory issue?
The 2013 Act is the statute. Vishaka had already derived the duty from Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 when no statute existed.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle. -
2024 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity. -
2023 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment. -
2023 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
" The Construction of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society". Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. -
2023 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by the Union Governments since mid 1990s. -
2022 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Vice -Presidents of India as the chairman of the Rajyasabha. -
2022 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by ne Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature. -
2022 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment.
Indian Constitution
Democracy needs courts that can enforce the Constitution against the elected majority. Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, charged salaries, and a hard removal process are the main guarantees. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC were struck down in 2015 as a threat to independence of appointments. Independence is a prerequisite; opacity of the collegium is a separate reform problem, not a reason to remove the guarantee.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.
Governance and Policy
Article 39A and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, create the right to free legal aid. Section 12 names SC/ST persons, women, children, persons in custody, workmen, persons with disability, disaster victims, and the income-poor. NALSA heads the statutory system of State authorities, court committees, clinics and Lok Adalats. The system is wide in design and still thin in quality of trial representation. Assessment therefore credits outreach and asks for better fees, first-hearing counsel, and published coverage data.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.
Governance and Policy
The 74th Amendment and the Twelfth Schedule create municipalities but leave devolution to State law. Parastatals and State-appointed commissioners keep functions out of the elected council. Property tax is constrained; GST ended octroi and sent compensation to States, not cities. Late State Finance Commissions and approval for borrowing keep cities fiscally dependent. The statement is correct: functional and financial empowerment is still a State choice.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.