Revision summary
Article 356 use declined after the mid-1990s for legal and political reasons together. S.R. Bommai (1994) made the proclamation justiciable and centred the floor test. The 44th Amendment had already limited duration and required parliamentary approval. Sarkaria and Punchhi recommended last-resort use; courts enforced that idea. Coalition Union governments and regional parties raised the political price of dismissal. The Article remains; casual partisan use became harder.
Model answer
Introduction
Article 356 allows the President to assume a State’s government when the constitutional machinery has failed. After the mid-1990s its use fell because the Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai (1994) legalised limits, and because coalition and later competitive federal politics raised the political cost of dismissal.
Body
The legal factors
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) held that a Presidential proclamation under Article 356 is justiciable; the Union must have relevant material, and the Court can strike down a mala fide or irrelevant proclamation.
- Bommai made the floor test the primary proof of majority; the Governor’s report cannot replace a vote in the Assembly when the House can meet.
- Secularism was held to be a basic feature, so a State government that undermines it can still invite Article 356, but ordinary political instability cannot.
- The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, had already required the proclamation to be laid before Parliament, limited the first period, and barred dissolution of the Assembly until Parliament approves; Bommai enforced the spirit of those curbs.
- Later cases — Rameshwar Prasad (Bihar, 2006) and the Arunachal and Uttarakhand episodes — showed that courts will restore a government when the Governor or the Union rushes dissolution or floor arithmetic.
- Sarkaria Commission (1988) and later the Punchhi Commission on Centre–State relations had recommended rare, last-resort use; Bommai turned that advice into judicial rule.
The political factors
- Hung verdicts and coalition Union governments from 1989 through the 1990s made every State party a potential partner; dismissing a State government risked losing parliamentary support in New Delhi.
- The rise of strong regional parties meant that Article 356 was read as an attack on a whole linguistic or regional electorate, not only on a Chief Minister.
- Television, a louder Rajya Sabha, and Inter-State Council politics after the 1990s made a midnight dismissal nationally expensive.
- Even majority Union governments after 2014 still face judicial review, Election Commission schedules, and the need for State allies on GST and other federal files, so the old single-party habit of routine President’s Rule is harder to revive.
- Hung Assemblies now more often produce floor tests, Governor’s invitations, and Speaker fights rather than an immediate Article 356, which is a political substitute, not always a cleaner one.
Residual use
- Article 356 still appears in genuine breakdown, hung Houses after large defections, or law-and-order collapse.
- The reduction is therefore frequency and casual use, not repeal of the Article.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[SR Bommai 1994] --> J[Judicial review floor test] F[44th Amendment] --> P[Parliamentary approval] C[Coalition and regional parties] --> K[High political cost] J --> R[Rarer Article 356] P --> R K --> R
Conclusion
Legal limits after Bommai — justiciability, relevant material, and the floor test — made casual Article 356 legally dangerous. Coalition federalism and strong regional parties made it politically expensive. Together they explain the fall in frequency since the mid-1990s.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the role of the Vice -Presidents of India as the chairman of the Rajyasabha.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q4). View answer →
-
Did Bommai abolish Article 356?
No. It subjected the proclamation to judicial review and to the floor test. The Union can still use the Article on relevant material.
-
Why did coalitions matter?
A Union that needs regional parties in the Lok Sabha cannot dismiss those parties’ State governments without losing its own majority politics.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle. -
2024 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity. -
2023 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment. -
2023 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
" The Construction of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society". Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. -
2023 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the constitutional perspectives of Gender Justice with the help of relevant Constitutional Provisions and case laws. -
2022 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Vice -Presidents of India as the chairman of the Rajyasabha. -
2022 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by ne Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature. -
2022 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected.
More from this topic
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 10 marks
Compare and contrast the President's power to pardon in India and in the USA. Are there any limits to it in both the countries? What are 'preemptive pardons'?
Indian Constitution
Article 72 (and 161) are exercised on aid and advice; Maru Ram, Kehar Singh, Epuru Sudhakar and Shatrughan Chauhan frame Indian limits and delay. The US Article II pardon is personal, federal-only, and barred in impeachment. Judicial review is stronger in India; political cost is the main US brake. A preemptive pardon forgives before conviction, as in Ford–Nixon. India has no working doctrine of preemptive pardon for the untried.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss India as a secular state and compare with the secular principles of the US constitution.
Indian Constitution
Indian secularism: Preamble, Articles 25–28, Bommai as basic structure, personal laws, State reform of Hindu law and regulation of temples. US secularism: First Amendment establishment and free exercise, Everson’s wall, Engel on school prayer, no millet personal law. India practises principled distance and social reform; the United States practises non-establishment. Minority educational rights under Article 30 have no US analogue of that form. Neither wall nor distance is a finished peace with majoritarian politics. Comparison is of method, not of piety.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks
Right to privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty and is inherently protected under Article 21 of the constitution. Explain. In this reference discuss the law relating to D.N.A. testing of child in the womb to establish its paternity.
Indian Constitution
Puttaswamy held that privacy is part of Article 21 and that any restriction must be legal, necessary and proportionate. Section 112 of the Evidence Act treats a child born in a valid marriage as legitimate unless non-access is proved. Goutam Kundu and later cases refused to make DNA a routine paternity weapon in a private quarrel. A test on a child still in the womb adds miscarriage risk and collides with the woman’s bodily autonomy. Suchita Srivastava had already linked reproductive choice to personal liberty. Proportionality will rarely justify a prenatal paternity expedition. The law of paternity is not a right to inspect a womb.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.