Revision summary
Cooperation runs through the GST Council, All-India Services and disaster law. Competition appears in investment races and NITI-style indices after higher tax devolution. Confrontation shows in CBI consent withdrawals, GST compensation fights and 2020 farm-law resistance. Delhi’s LG–government dispute is executive confrontation inside a Union Territory with a legislature. Indian federalism is all three at once; no single word captures 2014–20 practice.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Indian federalism is not a frozen list of Articles 245–263. It is a daily mix of cooperation in shared subjects, competition for investment and rankings, and confrontation when party and fiscal interests collide. All three have shaped the Union of States, especially after coalition decline and GST.
Body
Cooperation
- The GST Council under Article 279A is cooperative federalism in a fiscal form: Union and States vote on rates and the compensation bargain.
- All-India Services, the Inter-State Council, and disaster response under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, force joint working even when governments differ.
- NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission’s one-way plan with a think-tank and index culture; the cooperative claim is consultation, though States still contest the Union’s agenda-setting.
- COVID-19 in 2020 showed both: States ran hospitals and lockdowns; the Union used the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and the DM Act as national frames.
Competition
- Competitive federalism is visible in ease-of-doing-business tables, health and education indices, and States bidding for electronics and automobile plants.
- The Fourteenth Finance Commission’s 42 per cent devolution widened untied space in which States could compete on their own priorities.
- Competition is healthy when it raises service delivery; it is hollow when rankings hide the Union’s hold on cesses and CSS design.
Confrontation
- GST compensation delay, CBI general-consent withdrawals by Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal, and the 2020 farm-law protests (States such as Punjab legislating against the Union package) are confrontation inside the same Constitution.
- Article 356 is rarer than in the 1970s–80s, but Lieutenant Governor versus elected government in Delhi, and Governor–government friction in several States, keep a confrontational executive federalism alive.
- The Supreme Court’s NCT Delhi line on collaborative federalism is itself a judicial attempt to civilise confrontation.
How far they have shaped the federation
- Cooperation built the working machinery; competition changed the language of reform; confrontation decides the political limits of the Centre. India’s federation is cooperative in design, competitive in growth politics, and confrontational whenever a strong Union meets Opposition States.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CO[Cooperation GST disaster AIS] --> F[Indian federation] CP[Competition indices investment] --> F CN[Confrontation CBI farm GST dues] --> F
Conclusion
- Cooperation, competition and confrontation have jointly shaped Indian federalism: GST and disaster law as joint work, indices and investment as State rivalry, and consent, compensation and farm laws as conflict. The nature of the federation is therefore a moving bargain, not a single adjective.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in the recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q4). View answer →
-
Is Indian federalism only cooperative?
The Constitution leans Union-strong and invites cooperation. Practice also includes competition and open confrontation.
-
Did GST end Centre–State conflict?
It created a joint table. Compensation and cess disputes show the table does not abolish conflict.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2023 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the role of the Competition Commission of India in containing the abuse of dominant position by the Multi-National Corporations in India. Refer to the recent decisions. -
2026 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
"China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has transformed South Asia from a regional space into a theatre of great power competition." Analyse the strategic implications of the BRI for India's security and regional influence in South Asia. -
2024 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the geopolitical and geostrategic importance of Maldives for India, with a focus on global trade and energy flows. Further, also discuss how this relationship affects India's maritime security and regional stability amidst international competition?
More from this topic
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 15 marks · Solution
To what extent do pressure groups, social movements and corporate lobbies deepen pluralistic democracy in India by representing excluded interests? Analyse whether the growing convergence of corporate wealth and political power poses a threat to the autonomy of formal democratic institutions.
Governance and Policy
• Civil society groups and grassroots movements go beyond periodic elections to channel marginalized voices into policy spaces. • Social movements on tribal rights and environmental protection have successfully forced the state to create protective legislation. • Representation is uneven due to a severe resource asymmetry between well-funded corporate lobbies and unorganized labor. • Some interest groups act as elite fronts, subverting public welfare for narrow sectarian gains. • Corporate financial dominance through opaque funding creates severe risks of policy capture and quid pro quo corruption. • Strengthening transparency in political funding and reinforcing regulatory autonomy are essential to safeguard democratic governance.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 15 marks · Solution
What is meant by judicial legislation? In this context, discuss the verdicts of the apex court allowing "passive euthanasia" and a "living will".
Governance and Policy
• Judicial legislation occurs when courts create binding rules to fill policy voids caused by legislative inaction. • The Supreme Court legalized passive euthanasia under Article 21, recognizing the right to die with dignity. • The *Common Cause* (2018) judgment permitted the withdrawal of life support for terminally ill patients with strict medical safeguards. • A living will is an advanced medical directive allowing individuals to pre-state their treatment preferences before incapacitation. • The Supreme Court simplified living will procedures in 2023, replacing complex magistrate approvals with basic notary attestation. • While court guidelines provide immediate relief, they underscore the need for a comprehensive parliamentary statute on end-of-life care. • Codifying these judicial norms through formal legislation ensures democratic legitimacy, ethical debate, and administrative clarity.
Q6 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 10 marks · Solution
Does India's tribal development policy reflect the aspirations for a socially grounded and equity-based governance? Justify your answer.
Governance and Policy
• India's tribal policy balances constitutional protections with socio-economic development goals. • Fifth and Sixth Schedules provide decentralized autonomy and safeguard tribal lands. • Articles 275(1) and 335 ensure grants-in-aid and reservations to bridge gaps. • PESA (1996) and FRA (2006) mark shifts toward rights-based and culturally sensitive governance. • Gram sabhas are empowered over minor forest produce and community forest rights. • Implementation is hindered by forced displacement without consent and bureaucratic inertia. • True equity requires empowering local institutions rather than relying solely on welfare delivery.