Revision summary
Corrupt practices are listed in Section 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Election petitions in the High Court and Section 8A disqualification by the President after the Election Commission’s opinion are separate, slow tracks. A member can sit through much of a term while the petition and the 8A file move. Lily Thomas made conviction-based disqualification immediate; the corrupt-practice route was not similarly tightened. Time-bound petitions and a single visible disqualification consequence would match the Act’s purpose.
Model answer
Introduction
Corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, is meant to keep a tainted candidate out of the House. The procedure that converts a High Court finding into actual disqualification is slow, split across forums, and easy to game with appeals. Simplification is therefore a democratic need, not a drafting nicety.
Body
What the law already does
- Section 123 of the RPA lists corrupt practices: bribery, undue influence, appeal to religion or caste, booth capture, and expenditure beyond the prescribed limit.
- An election petition under Sections 80–100 lies in the High Court; if the returned candidate is found guilty, the election can be declared void.
- Separate from the petition, Section 8A lets the President disqualify a person found guilty of a corrupt practice, after the opinion of the Election Commission, for a period that the Commission recommends.
- Section 8, by contrast, is the criminal-conviction route that Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013) made immediate upon a two-year-plus sentence, which is why the corrupt-practice track looks even slower beside it.
Why the procedure needs simplification
- An election petition can run past a large part of the five-year term; a member who sits while the case crawls enjoys the fruits of the very practice the Act condemns.
- The High Court finding, the President’s order, and the Commission’s opinion are three clocks; stay orders and adjournments multiply them.
- Voters, rival candidates, and the Commission cannot read a single timeline; complexity itself becomes a shield.
- Model Code and expenditure cases often die as technical disputes rather than as clean findings of corrupt practice.
What simplification should look like
- A statutory outer limit for election petitions, with day-to-day hearing as the Supreme Court has already urged in principle.
- One disqualification consequence that follows a confirmed finding of corrupt practice, without a long second round unless a constitutional court stays it for recorded reasons.
- Publish the Section 8A calendar so the President–Commission step is not an invisible file.
- Recommendation: treat corrupt practice as seriously as the Lily Thomas conviction rule, or the RPA’s moral claim remains a paper threat.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CP[s.123 corrupt practice] --> EP[High Court election petition] EP --> VO[Election void] EP --> EC[EC opinion s.8A] EC --> PR[President disqualifies] DL[Delay and stays] --> PR
Conclusion
The RPA already names corrupt practices and gives High Courts and the President tools to disqualify. The procedure is too fragmented and slow for those tools to bite inside one Lok Sabha term. Simplification — time-bound petitions and a single, visible disqualification follow-through — is needed if the Act is to protect the purity of elections rather than the sitting member.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q3). View answer →
-
Is Section 8 the same as corrupt practice?
No. Section 8 is disqualification on criminal conviction. Corrupt practice is an election-law wrong under Section 123, with a distinct 8A follow-through.
-
Would faster disqualification weaken the right to appeal?
Appeal can remain. What simplification attacks is default delay, not a reasoned stay by a constitutional court.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer. -
2020 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
The judicial systems in India and UK seem to be converging as well as diverging in the recent times. Highlight the key points of convergence and divergence between the two nations in terms of their judicial practices. -
2020 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
The strength sustenance of local institutions in India has shifted from their formative phase of 'Functions, Functionaries and Funs' to the contemporary stage of 'Functionality'. Highlight the critical challenges faced by local institutions in terms of their functionality in recent times. -
2020 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Rajya Sabha has been transformed from a 'useless stepney tyre' to the most useful supporting organ in past few decades. Highlight the factors as well as the areas in which this transformation could be visible. -
2019 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
"The Central Administration Tribunal which was established for redressal of grievances and complaints by or against central government employees, nowadays is exercising its powers as an independent judicial authority." Explain. -
2019 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
What are the methods used by the Farmers organizations to influence the policy- makers in India and how effective are these methods? -
2019 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
Despite Consistent experience of High growth, India still goes with the lowest indicators of human development. Examine the issues that make balanced and inclusive development elusive. -
2019 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation.
More from this topic
Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.
Governance and Policy
Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.
Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.
Governance and Policy
The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.
Governance and Policy
Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.