Q8 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2019 · GS II · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q6 Q9 →

Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation.

Topic: Governance and Policy. Syllabus: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors and issues arising out of their design and implementation. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and Governance and Policy.

Revision summary

ICT projects fail on last-mile access, language, unreformed files, silos, weak staff, vendor lock-in and poor privacy. Counting portals is not the same as a delivered service. Re-engineer process first, then code. Use CSC, local language, DBT exception paths and statutory fallbacks for NFSA and MGNREGA. Audit vendors and measure time-to-service and exclusion, not downloads.

Model answer

Introduction

Information and Communication Technology can speed services, payments, and records, as Digital India, Common Service Centres, and Direct Benefit Transfer have shown. Projects still fail when the machine is put before the process, when the last mile is dark, and when the citizen cannot read the screen. Effective implementation treats those vital factors as design conditions, not as later complaints.

Body

Vital factors that cause failure

  • Last-mile connectivity, electricity, and device access remain weak in many blocks, so a portal is not a service for the intended user.
  • Language, literacy, disability, and gender gaps recreate a kiosk middleman; the Second Administrative Reforms Commission warned that e-governance without inclusion becomes a new queue.
  • Process is not re-engineered: paper files are scanned without changing approvals, so delay is digitised.
  • Inter-department silos, unmatched data, and no unique process owner split one citizen life across unlinked databases.
  • Capacity of Block and municipal staff is thin; vendors then run the project and lock the government in.
  • Privacy, consent, and cyber security are afterthoughts, so leaks and downtime destroy trust.
  • Monitoring counts logins and camps, not reduced visits, speaking orders, or grievance closure; political launch outruns maintenance budgets.

Measures for effective implementation

  • Design offline and assisted modes through Common Service Centres and BharatNet, with local-language interfaces, before making a scheme app-only.
  • Re-engineer the approval chain first, then write software, as the National e-Governance Plan and later Digital India mission mode projects were meant to do.
  • Use the Jan Dhan–Aadhaar–mobile rail for payments only with a recorded exception path, so exclusion errors can be corrected the way DBT circulars already allow in principle.
  • Name a process owner, publish service standards, and audit vendors; do not treat ICT as a one-time capital scheme.
  • Train local staff and para-operators; pay for operations, not only for launch hardware.
  • Keep a paper or token fallback for entitlements under NFSA, MGNREGA, and pensions, so a server outage does not cancel a statutory right.
  • Log access to personal data, disclose the rule and the fee on the same screen, and measure success by time-to-service and appeals allowed, not by app downloads.

Short way forward

  • Fund connectivity and literacy as part of the project cost, bind vendors to open standards, and put every ICT mission under a public dashboard of exclusion and downtime.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  F[Vital failure factors] --> A[Access language process]
  F --> S[Silos vendors no privacy]
  M[Re-engineer then software] --> C[CSC BharatNet DBT]
  M --> O[Owner audit fallback]
  C --> E[Effective ICT service]
  O --> E

Conclusion

ICT programmes suffer on access, language, unreformed process, silos, staff capacity, privacy, and vanity monitoring. They work when Digital India tools follow a redesigned service, an assisted last mile, and a legal fallback so that NFSA or MGNREGA rights do not depend on a live server alone.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks

    'Virus of Conflict is affecting the functioning of the SCO'. In the light of the above statement point out the role of India in mitigating problems.

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks

    The jurisdiction of the Central Bureau of Investigation(CBI) regarding lodging an FIR and conducting probe within a particular state is being questioned by various States. However, the power of States to withhold consent to the CBI is not absolute. Explain with special reference to the federal character of India.

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks

    Has digital illiteracy, particularly in rural areas, couple with lack of Information and Communication Technology(ICT) accessibility hindered socio-economic development? Examine with justification.

    View answer →

  4. 2019 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks

    Do you think that constitution of India does not accept principle of strict separation of powers rather it is based on the principle of 'checks and balance'? Explain.

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks

    "What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India's National self- esteem and ambitions" Explain with suitable examples.(15).

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks

    "Policy contradictions among various competing sectors and stakeholders have resulted in inadequate 'protection and prevention of degradation to environment." Comment with relevant illustrations.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks

    How far do you agree with the view that tribunals curtail the jurisdiction of ordinary courts? In view of the above, discuss the constitutional validity and competency of the tribunals in India. (15).

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks

    Multiplicity of various commissions for the vulnerable sections of the society leads to problems of overlapping jurisdiction and duplication of functions. Is it better to merge all commissions into an umbrella Human Rights Commission? Argue your case. (15).

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.

Governance and Policy

Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.

Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.

Governance and Policy

The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.

Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks

What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.

Governance and Policy

Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.