Revision summary
Anthropometry is standardised body measurement. Nutrition uses height, weight, arm circumference, and z-scores. Stunting and wasting separate chronic from acute lack. Sport uses somatotype and proportions as one input beside physiology. Boas’s plasticity warning still forbids racial misuse.
Model answer
Introduction
Anthropometry is the standardised measurement of the human body. It is a cheap, repeatable tool for nutrition and for the morphology of sport, not a return to racial typing.
Body
Method
- Height, weight, sitting height, circumferences, and skinfolds follow Martin landmarks and Tanner growth logic.
- Indices include BMI, waist–hip ratio, and mid-upper-arm circumference. In children, z-scores against WHO or ICMR references flag stunting and wasting.
- Boas already used anthropometry to show plasticity. That is the opposite of a fixed race chart.
Nutritional status
- Stunting (low height-for-age) records chronic lack. Wasting (low weight-for-height) records acute lack. Underweight mixes both.
- Skinfolds and arm muscle area estimate fat and protein stores. High BMI can hide micronutrient lack.
- Community surveys in India still rely on these measures because they travel to the village.
Sports capability
- Somatotypes after Sheldon, later Heath–Carter, sort endomorphy, mesomorphy, and ectomorphy. Sprinters and weightlifters cluster differently from distance runners.
- Limb length, sitting-height ratio, and grip or reach help selection. They do not replace VO2 max, skill, or training.
- Population means, as in some Inuit or high-altitude chests, are starting points, not destiny. Nutrition in childhood writes the adult athlete as much as a gene.
Ethic
- Use anthropometry for health and performance. Do not revive it as a ladder of peoples.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD AN[Anthropometry] --> NUT[Stunting wasting BMI] AN --> SP[Somatotype limb ratios] NUT --> REF[WHO ICMR charts] SP --> TR[Training skill physiology]
Conclusion
Anthropometry assesses growth, undernutrition, and sport build through standardised sizes. It is a bio-cultural instrument when references and training are named, not a race science.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss various tools of data collection in conducting anthropological research
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is a mesomorph automatically a better athlete?
Shape helps some events. Skill, training, and oxygen transport decide performance.
-
Can BMI diagnose an individual?
It screens. Muscle, age, and oedema can mislead. Combine with other measures.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How anthropologists assess the nutritional status of a community? Discuss the significance of intersectionality of ecology, culture, and social inequality in the study of nutritional anthropology -
2025 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Anthropology provides a multidimensional understanding of human beings by bridging the gap between science and humanities. Elucidate -
2024 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the applications of forensic anthropology with suitable examples. -
2023 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss various methods of personal identification based on skeletal remains. -
2023 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the practical applications of DNA technology in the current scenario. -
2022 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Genetic imprinting in human diseases -
2022 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss how anthropological knowledge of the human body may be used in designing equipments and articles of human use -
2021 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
How are the cases of disputed paternity solved? Discuss the recent techniques
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Animism and Deep Ecology
Religion
Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory
Family
Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Historical Particularism and Franz Boas
Historical particularism (Boas)
Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.