Revision summary
Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.
Model answer
Introduction
Animism and Deep Ecology both refuse a dead nature. One is a classical theory of religion. The other is an ecological ethic that anthropology now reads beside indigenous personhood.
Body
Animism
- E. B. Tylor defined animism as belief in spiritual beings. Souls, ghosts, and nature-spirits were, for him, the minimum of religion.
- Later ethnography, from Irving Hallowell on Ojibwa other-than-human persons to Amazonian work, treated animism as a relational ontology, not a childish error.
- Andaman islanders and many forest peoples address animals and places as persons. The point is social relation, not a museum of superstition.
Deep Ecology
- Arne Naess coined Deep Ecology. Nature has intrinsic worth, not only use-value for humans.
- The platform rejects shallow conservation that saves a park for tourism. It asks for biospheric equality.
- Link and limit: animist personhood can support Naess’s ethic, but Tylor’s evolutionary ladder must not be smuggled back in.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD N[Nature as person or worth] --> T[Tylor animism] N --> NA[Naess Deep Ecology] T --> P[Other-than-human persons] NA --> I[Intrinsic value]
Conclusion
Tylor named soul-belief. Naess named an ethic of intrinsic nature. Anthropology joins them only as two refusals of a resource-only world, not as one creed.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is Deep Ecology just animism in green language?
No. Animism is a theory of persons and spirits. Deep Ecology is a normative platform about worth and equality of life.
-
Did Tylor think animism was true?
He treated it as an early error that science would replace. Contemporary anthropology rejects that ranking.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine various anthropological interpretations about the Kula Ring -
2022 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Shaman, sorcerer and medicine man -
2016 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Totemism -
2016 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine different Anthropological approaches to Religion. -
2015 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
How do you relate the concepts of 'Sacred' and 'Profane' in Durkheim's theory of religion with a focus on the role of totem? -
2015 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically examine the Formalists' and Substantivists' views on the applicability of economic laws in the study of primitive societies -
2015 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the difference between emic and etic, and how does the difference derive from the study of language?
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory
Family
Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Historical Particularism and Franz Boas
Historical particularism (Boas)
Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
"The bio-cultural approach is the hallmark of Biological Anthropology." Explain.
Biological Anthropology.
Bio-cultural anthropology joins bodies to diet, work, climate, and social rule. Lactase and sickle cell show culture as a selective environment. Washburn moved the field from racial types to process. Tibetan altitude and Inuit cold are teaching loops of physiology and practice. The hallmark is interaction, not genetic reduction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.