Revision summary
Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.
Model answer
Introduction
Marriage regulations say who may marry whom. Alliance theory, after Lévi-Strauss, reads those rules as the exchange that makes society, not as a private romance.
Body
Regulations
- Incest prohibition, exogamy, endogamy, and preferred cousin marriage are the usual toolkit. Morgan tabulated kinship terms; the rules sit inside those terms.
- Positive rules name a category of spouse, as in Dravidian cross-cousin marriage. Negative rules only forbid.
- Louis Dumont showed how Indian alliance and hierarchy interlock. Marriage can rank houses, not only join two persons.
Alliance
- Claude Lévi-Strauss treated the woman-as-gift as the elementary structure: restricted exchange between two groups, or generalised exchange in a circle, as among Kachin discussed by Edmund Leach.
- Annette Weiner and Trobriand ethnography stressed that women also give and that valuables return. Alliance is not only men swapping sisters.
- The theory explains why a rule persists. It does not excuse treating women as objects.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD R[Marriage rules] --> I[Incest exogamy endogamy] R --> A[Alliance exchange] A --> L[Levi-Strauss] A --> K[Kachin Trobriand]
Conclusion
Regulations are the grammar. Alliance theory is the claim that marriage weaves groups. Trobriand, Kachin, and Dumont’s India remain the teaching cases.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Historical Particularism and Franz Boas
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is alliance the opposite of descent theory?
They stress different axes. Descent names group membership. Alliance names how groups marry. Most systems use both.
-
Does alliance theory require cousin marriage?
Elementary systems often do. Complex systems, in Lévi-Strauss’s terms, forbid close kin and leave choice more open.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How the study of variation in forms of marriage led to rethinking on the concepts of social reproduction, kinship and family? -
2024 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define urbanization and discuss its impact on family in India with examples. -
2023 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the role of marriage regulations in traditional societies in India for strengthening social solidarity. -
2022 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss how the rules of descent contradict the principles of residence in matrilineal society, mentioning suitable examples? -
2022 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Household and domestic group. -
2016 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of urbanization and feminist movements on family in India. -
2015 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define family and critically examine the universality of family
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Animism and Deep Ecology
Religion
Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Historical Particularism and Franz Boas
Historical particularism (Boas)
Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
"The bio-cultural approach is the hallmark of Biological Anthropology." Explain.
Biological Anthropology.
Bio-cultural anthropology joins bodies to diet, work, climate, and social rule. Lactase and sickle cell show culture as a selective environment. Washburn moved the field from racial types to process. Tibetan altitude and Inuit cold are teaching loops of physiology and practice. The hallmark is interaction, not genetic reduction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.