Revision summary
Jeffreys’s DNA fingerprinting and STR databases serve courts and disaster victim identification. PCR is the workhorse of pathogen testing, including COVID-19. Medical uses include screening, pharmacogenomics, and early gene editing. Pääbo’s aDNA methods serve prehistory, including Indian Harappan genomes. GM crops and wildlife barcoding are agrarian and forensic ecological uses. Consent and over-reading ancestry as race remain anthropological limits.
Model answer
Introduction
DNA technology reads, copies, and sometimes edits genetic material. Its current practical uses run from courts and clinics to farms, ancestry, and pandemic tests.
Body
Identification and kinship
- Alec Jeffreys introduced DNA fingerprinting in 1984; STR profiles now identify suspects, exonerate the wrongfully accused, and match disaster victims when a reference exists.
- Paternity and immigration kinship tests use the same markers, which forensic anthropology now pairs with bone profiles.
- Databases such as national crime indexes raise liberty questions that anthropology of the state must notice.
Medicine and public health
- PCR, associated with Kary Mullis, underpins pathogen tests, including the COVID-19 diagnostic wave.
- Carrier screening, prenatal tests, BRCA and other risk panels, and pharmacogenomics tailor drugs to genotype.
- Gene therapy and CRISPR editing, after Doudna and Charpentier, are entering clinics for a few monogenic diseases, with ethics still contested.
Ancestry, ancient DNA, and population study
- Svante Pääbo’s ancient DNA methods reconstruct archaic admixture and prehistoric movement, as in Neanderthal genomes and South Asian aDNA from sites such as Rakhigarhi.
- Commercial ancestry tests are popular and often over-interpreted as race.
Food, environment, and industry
- GM crops, DNA barcoding of wildlife for poaching cases, and GMO labelling disputes are applied molecular biology in the agrarian and conservation field.
- Recombinant insulin and vaccines are older industrial applications that still matter.
Anthropological caution
- DNA can name a body and still not name a culture.
- Consent, caste politics of sampling, and the return of results to indigenous groups are part of current practice, not extras.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DNA[DNA technology] --> F[Forensic kinship] DNA --> M[Medicine PCR CRISPR] DNA --> A[Ancient DNA ancestry] DNA --> G[GM barcoding]
Conclusion
DNA technology now identifies persons, diagnoses infection and risk, edits a few diseases, and reconstructs prehistory. The current scenario is laboratory power plus consent and interpretation, not a code that replaces society.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Genetic imprinting in human diseases
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Does aDNA tell us who has a right to land?
No. Prehistoric ancestry is not a land title. Living tenure, law, and politics decide rights.
-
Is CRISPR already routine in hospitals?
It is a current application in a few trials and approvals, not a general hospital tool for all disease.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
How anthropologists assess the nutritional status of a community? Discuss the significance of intersectionality of ecology, culture, and social inequality in the study of nutritional anthropology -
2025 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Anthropology provides a multidimensional understanding of human beings by bridging the gap between science and humanities. Elucidate -
2024 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the applications of forensic anthropology with suitable examples. -
2023 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss various methods of personal identification based on skeletal remains. -
2022 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Genetic imprinting in human diseases -
2022 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss how anthropological knowledge of the human body may be used in designing equipments and articles of human use -
2021 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
How are the cases of disputed paternity solved? Discuss the recent techniques -
2021 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is Anthropometry? Discuss its role in assessing the nutritional status and sports capability of a person
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the utility of human remains in forensic analysis. Discuss the facial reconstruction technique
Applications of Anthropology
Forensic anthropology estimates sex, age, stature and trauma from bones and teeth, and it records context. Krogman and Stewart standardised osteological identification. DNA STRs and dentistry confirm identity when references exist. Clyde Snow’s human-rights cases show remains as testimony. Facial reconstruction uses tissue-depth markers, as in Gerasimov and Gatliff, now often with CT and 3D prints. The face is an approximation to prompt recognition, not a certain portrait. Ethics include family consent and no racial or caste over-claim.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are genetic markers? Discuss their applications in understanding population variation, disease association and forensics
Applications of Anthropology
A genetic marker is a heritable polymorphism that can be read in families or populations. Classical markers include ABO and proteins. DNA markers include SNPs, STRs, mtDNA and Y haplotypes. Population applications map variation and movement and undermine typological race. Disease applications include sickle-cell and malaria, HLA, counselling, and GWAS. Forensic applications include STR identification, mtDNA from degraded samples, and Y-lineage in mixtures. Lewontin’s within-group diversity and Jeffreys’s DNA fingerprinting are central names.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Anthropology provides a multidimensional understanding of human beings by bridging the gap between science and humanities. Elucidate
Applications of Anthropology
Anthropology studies one species as organism and as meaning-maker. The science side is palaeoanthropology, genetics, anthropometry and dating. The humanities side is ethnography, ritual, kinship and interpretation, as in Geertz. The bridge is biocultural questions such as nutrition, forensics, language and embodiment. The two failures are reductionism and culturalism. Fossils and symbols belong in one understanding of the human.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.