Revision summary
Globalization reorganised work through cross-border value chains and lean contracts. Indian IT, garments, SEZs, and platforms show a split of secure core and flexible margin. Informalisation, precarity, feminised export work, and migration are the main patterns. Marx’s reserve army and Standing’s precariat read the discipline of wages. Formalisation of the mass of Indian labour did not follow growth.
Model answer
Introduction
Economic globalization is the tightening of trade, finance, and production across borders. In the twenty-first century it has changed where work is done, how contracts are written, and who bears risk. The pattern is not one story of more jobs everywhere. It is a split between a small secure core and a large flexible margin.
Body
What changed in the organisation of work
- Global value chains locate design in some countries and assembly in others, which Gary Gereffi and others mapped as buyer-driven and producer-driven chains.
- Export processing, special economic zones, and business-process outsourcing moved routine tasks to cheaper labour, including large Indian IT and call-centre employment after the 1990s reforms.
- Just-in-time production and lean staffing borrowed Taylorist control without Taylor’s promise of a high industrial wage for the mass of workers.
- Finance and retail concentration press suppliers to cut labour cost, which informalises work at the bottom of the chain.
Patterns of employment
- Informalisation: a large share of Indian workers remain without written contracts, which the ILO and Indian labour statistics record as the normal form, not a residue.
- Precarity: Guy Standing named a class of workers with unstable hours, no career ladder, and thin social security.
- Platform and gig work: ride-hail and delivery apps classify workers as partners, which shifts social-security cost off the firm.
- Feminisation of some export and care chains, with women in garments and electronics on short contracts, while unpaid care at home is unchanged.
- Skill polarisation: high returns to a narrow professional layer, and deskilling or stagnant pay in routine services.
- Migration: internal and international labour moves to construction, care, and logistics, with remittances as household wage.
Theoretical reading
- Marx’s reserve army is visible as a global pool that disciplines local wages.
- Weber’s market class situation now includes cross-border competition for the same task.
- Frank’s underdevelopment thesis is too simple as a total law, but the hierarchy of design versus assembly still organises employment chances.
- Castells described a network enterprise. The network is real. So is the exclusion of those off the node.
What did not happen
- Full formalisation of the Indian workforce did not follow growth.
- A global equalisation of wages did not occur. Gaps between cores and margins remain.
- Trade unions lost coverage in many tradable sectors even as new worker associations appear in platforms.
Explanation in sum
- Twenty-first century employment under globalization is more cross-border, more contractual at the top, and more informal and platform-based at the margin.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Economic globalization] --> V[Global value chains] V --> C[Core secure professional] V --> M[Margin informal gig] R[Reserve army across borders] --> M F[Finance and lean production] --> M
Conclusion
Economic globalization changed employment by stretching production across chains, expanding informal and gig contracts, polarising skill, and using a global reserve of labour. Indian IT and garment work show the split. Marx, Standing, and chain analysis explain the pattern better than a story of uniform job creation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you think that the social media has brought significant changes in the forms of protest? Argue your case
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Did globalization only destroy jobs?
It created export and service jobs and destroyed or informalised others. The net is a changed pattern, not a single loss figure.
-
Is gig work the whole of twenty-first century employment?
No. It is a visible new form. Public jobs, factory jobs, and farm work still employ large numbers, often under new chain pressures.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you assess the changing patterns in kinship relations in societies today? -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the relevance of corporate social responsibility in a world marked by increasing environmental crises -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the distinctiveness of the feminist method of social research? Comment
Sociology as Science
Feminist method starts from women’s everyday work and treats gender as power, not as an extra variable. Smith, Harding, Oakley, and Collins made standpoint, reflexivity, and intersection the core tools. It criticises Durkheim-style distance that treated the male public actor as the normal subject. Indian care work, dowry, and the double day show what occupation surveys miss. The method stays empirical. It is not a substitute for evidence.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the relationship between sociology and political science
Sociology as Science
Both disciplines study power. Political science centres the state. Sociology centres groups and everyday domination. Marx, Weber, Pareto, Michels, and Mills already joined class, party, and elite. Durkheim and Parsons treated the polity as part of a wider social system. Indian elections, Mandal, and civil society research fail if the two fields are sealed. The relation is complementary, not a hierarchy of sciences.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life?
Sociology
Goffman reads everyday life as performance with front and back regions, teams, and face-work. The point is the shared definition of the situation, not a claim that all talk is false. Mead’s Me is made public on this stage. Asylums shows what happens when the back region is removed. The method is strong on encounters and weak as a full theory of class and the state.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.