Revision summary
CSR is the firm’s claimed duty beyond profit to community and nature. Climate and toxicity make that duty relevant because firms produce much of the harm. India’s section 135 and ESG reporting institutionalise spending and disclosure. Bhopal and offshoring of dirt show the limit of voluntary virtue. Regulation and a change in the energy base remain the core response.
Model answer
Introduction
Corporate social responsibility is the claim that firms have duties beyond profit to workers, communities, and nature. In a world of climate disruption, toxic waste, and biodiversity loss, that claim is relevant as a limited tool. It is not a substitute for public regulation of production.
Body
Why it is relevant
- Environmental crises are produced in large part by industrial and extractive firms, so the same organisations are asked to internalise costs they once dumped.
- Archie Carroll’s pyramid placed legal and ethical duties beside philanthropy. Climate risk now sits inside the economic duty itself, because stranded assets and disasters hit the balance sheet.
- India’s Companies Act, 2013, section 135, made a spending mandate for large companies, and Schedule VII lists environment among eligible heads.
- The United Nations Global Compact and later ESG reporting give a common language for investors to compare firms.
Limits in a crisis
- CSR can be a public-relations budget beside a polluting core, which the Bhopal gas disaster of 1984 still illustrates as a failure of industrial duty.
- Voluntary codes do not bind competitors. A firm that cuts emissions can lose market share if law does not bind the rest.
- Andre Gunder Frank’s map of core and periphery still matters: dirty processes move to weaker regulators while CSR reports are written at headquarters.
- Marx’s point on surplus remains: a firm exists to accumulate. CSR does not abolish that drive.
Examination
- Relevant as disclosure, local repair, and a political language that communities can use in court and in the press.
- Insufficient as the main response to climate and toxicity, which need state standards, liability, and a change in the energy base.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Firm accumulation] --> H[Environmental harm] C[CSR ESG mandate] --> R[Report repair spend] H --> R L[Public regulation] --> H R --> X[Limited without law]
Conclusion
CSR is relevant in environmental crisis because firms are central producers of harm and can be pressed to report and repair. It is not sufficient, because voluntary spending cannot replace binding rules and a change in accumulation. Use it as one lever beside law, not as the solution.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q5(d)). View answer →
-
Does section 135 stop pollution?
It mandates spending and reporting for eligible firms. Pollution control still depends on environmental law and enforcement.
-
Is ESG the same as CSR?
ESG is mainly an investor reporting frame. CSR is a broader duty talk, including philanthropy and local projects.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does the dramaturgical perspective enable our understanding of everyday life? -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is reference group theory a universally applicable model? Elucidate -
2023 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What, according to Robert Michels, is the iron law of oligarchy? Do lions folly and foxes in Vilfredo Pareto's theory, essentially differ from each other? Substantiate -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you assess the changing patterns in kinship relations in societies today? -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Do you think that common sense is the starting point of social research? What are its advantages and limitations? Explain -
2023 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Highlight the differences and similarities between totemism and animism -
2023 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyze critically David Morgan's views on family practices -
2023 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does women's education help to eradicate patriarchal discriminations? Reflect with illustrations
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.