Revision summary
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Model answer
Introduction
A gender-based domestic division of labour is the patterned assignment of unpaid household and care tasks according to sex, not according to taste alone. Cooking, cleaning, childcare, eldercare and the management of kin relations are still, in most societies, women’s work in the last instance. The question is whether women’s rising presence in formal employment is rewriting that script or merely adding a second shift to the first.
Body
The pattern and its theory
Ann Oakley made housework visible as work. Heidi Hartmann treated the domestic division as a pillar of patriarchy allied to capitalism: men as a group benefit from unpaid services that reproduce labour power. Arlie Hochschild’s The Second Shift showed dual-earner couples in which the woman’s paid job did not equalise the evening. Sylvia Walby listed household production among the structures of patriarchy. The arrangement is moralised as love and nature, which is why it is so sticky.
Is it changing with formal employment?
It is changing unevenly. In urban dual-earner professional households some men cook, some couples hire a cook or a nanny, and some delay fertility. Outsourcing transfers the gendered burden onto poorer women, often migrant and informal, rather than abolishing it. “Help” from husbands is still framed as favour, not duty. Time Use Survey 2019 in India found women spending several more hours a day on unpaid domestic work than men, a gap that employment status narrows only partly. Rural and small-town formal jobs for women, where they exist, often sit beside unchanged kin surveillance and the honour of a “good wife”. Maternity, unsafe transport and the motherhood penalty push some women out of formal jobs, which then restores the old division.
- Comparative research speaks of lagged adaptation: fertility and women’s employment move faster than men’s unpaid hours. Nordic policy shows that public childcare and paternal leave can shift the pattern; their absence in much of India keeps the domestic gender contract intact. So formal employment is a necessary pressure for change, not a sufficient cause. Illustrations should include both the new urban kitchen and the continuing dawn routine of unpaid work that makes the office possible.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DDL[Gendered domestic labour] --> UW[Unpaid care] FE[Women's formal employment] --> DB[Second shift dual burden] FE --> OUT[Outsource to paid domestic workers] FE --> PART[Partial male sharing] FE --> DDL
Conclusion
The domestic division of labour remains gendered even when women hold formal jobs. Change is real in some dual-earner settings and largely a dual burden or a shift onto poorer women in others. Employment without a reorganisation of care and male time will not complete the revolution at home.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
If a couple hires a maid, is the gender division gone?
It may be reduced between spouses and reproduced as classed, caste-inflected paid care work by other women.
-
Do all cultures share the same domestic map?
The content of tasks varies; the assignment of last-instance responsibility to women is widely documented, including in India.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Can Merton's reference group theory be relevant in understanding 'identity making' in digital world? Explain. -
2025 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain -
2025 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain -
2025 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss -
2024 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What are the 'basic and irreducible' functions of the family as proposed by Talcott Parsons? Explain. -
2024 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Describe the main idea of Max Weber's book, *The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism* as a critique of Marxism -
2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically explain the salient features of 'alienation' as propounded by Karl Marx -
2024 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Define the concept of 'gig' economy and discuss its impact on the labour market and workers' social security net
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q2(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Historical materialism explains social change from production, property and class struggle. Base and superstructure name the constraint of material life on law, politics and ideas. Capitalism is defined by wage labour, surplus value and contradiction. The theory remains relevant for global accumulation, gig work and India’s informal labour. Weberian status, feminist unpaid labour and culture mark its limits. Use it as a diagnostic of inequality, not as a total theory of society.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.