Revision summary
Fundamentalism is modern organised purity, not timeless faith. Religion matters as text, sect, charisma, and moral community. Marx, Weber, and Durkheim explain resources and meanings, not a simple piety motor. Parties, media, and failed secular promises organise the increase. Answer: important role as idiom; not a sufficient cause.
Model answer
Introduction
Fundamentalism is a modern organised claim to restore a pure, inerrant foundation against pluralism. Religion supplies symbols and congregations. It is not a sufficient cause. Politics, media, and insecurity organise the increase.
Body
Reasons to say yes, religion matters
- Sacred texts and the church as moral community, in Emile Durkheim’s sense, can be tightened into an exclusive we.
- Max Weber’s virtuoso and sect types train high-demand certainty; charisma can fuse with scripture.
- Meaning and theodicy, which Weber stressed, become political programmes when the world looks unjust.
Reasons not to blame “religion” as such
- Karl Marx: religion is protest and veil; the increase often tracks class and nation, not piety alone.
- Secularisation’s incompleteness and the secular state’s failures feed reactive faith, which Bryan Wilson’s decline thesis did not fully predict.
- Media markets and parties instrumentalise faith. That is organisation, which Robert K. Merton would split into manifest piety and latent power.
- Indian public religion long coexisted with pluralism; the increase of fundamentalism is a political-historical shift, not a sudden birth of belief.
Answer
- Religion is an important resource and idiom of fundamentalism.
- The increase is explained by modern organisation of certainty, not by the mere existence of temples or churches.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religious symbols church] --> FUND[Fundamentalism] POL[Parties media insecurity] --> FUND REL --> RES[Resource not sole cause]
Conclusion
Yes, religion plays an important role as sacred resource, sect discipline, and moral community. No, it is not an autonomous engine of the increase. Weber, Durkheim, and Marx together locate fundamentalism in modern politics using religious materials.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Religious pluralism is the order of present-day societies." Explain by giving suitable examples.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Are all devout people fundamentalists?
No. Everyday practice and inclusive churches differ from organised inerrant politics.
-
Does secularisation end fundamentalism?
Incomplete secularisation and political use of faith can intensify it.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give your comments on the growth of religious revivalism in the present day context -
2020 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically Analyse Durkheim's views on elementary forms of religious life and role of religion Also discuss the consequences of religious revivalism in contemporary society. -
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
State the reasons for the various religious beliefs and practices in pre-modern societies. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is sects? Discuss their role in multi-religious societies with empirical examples. -
2017 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Elaborate on various types of religious practices prevalent in India society -
2016 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Sociology is pre-eminently study of modern societies." Discuss -
2016 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Religious pluralism is the order of present-day societies." Explain by giving suitable examples. -
2015 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between sects and cults with illustrations.
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the nature of relationship between science and religion in modern society? Analyze with suitable examples
Religion and Society
Comte expected science to replace theology; Weber expected disenchantment of technique. Secularisation is regional, not a universal emptying of faith. Relations include conflict, institutional separation and practical coexistence. Berger’s later desecularisation thesis matches much of the contemporary world. India shows high-tech science beside public ritual and sacred politics. The modern pattern is differentiation plus plurality, not a simple war.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do you understand the phenomena of the mushrooming of sects and cults in contemporary society? Discuss the factors responsible for the trend
Religion and Society
Church–sect theory treats sects as demanding protest groups beside an accommodated church. Cult, in careful use, names looser or new mystical memberships, not a tabloid insult. New religious movements are the contemporary research label for much of this field. Factors include urban migration, a market in belief, charismatic founders and media. Crises of meaning and weak monopoly of old churches open space for new groups. India’s guru organisations and global NRMs illustrate the same structural trend.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does a multicultural society accommodate diversities of all kinds-ethnic, linguistic, and religious? Discuss its major challenges
Religion and Society
Multiculturalism is public recognition of ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity. Accommodation uses constitutions, federalism, language policy and civil mixing. India is a principal case of pluralism inside a democratic republic. Challenges include majoritarianism, communal violence and segregated everyday life. Inequality that maps onto community turns culture into conflict. Group rights can clash with gender justice and with a common civic status.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.