Revision summary
India rejected the NPT as a hierarchy of five. Pokhran 1974 and 1998 marked option then weapons. Doctrine is minimum deterrence and official no first use. The 2008 NSG waiver is the civil-nuclear entry ticket without NPT accession. The role is responsible possessor plus campaigner against a frozen club.
Model answer
Introduction
India moved from a moral critic of nuclear clubs to a State with nuclear weapons that still sits outside the NPT. The evolution is 1974, 1998, and the 2008 NSG waiver. Role means both capability and the rules India will accept.
Body
From critic to tester
- Nehru’s India backed disarmament and the idea of a world free of nuclear threat, while keeping a scientific option.
- The NPT (1968) locked a five-weapon-State hierarchy. India refused as discriminatory.
- Pokhran-I in 1974, a “peaceful nuclear explosion,” triggered technology denial and showed the option was real.
Open weapon status
- Pokhran-II in 1998 declared weapon tests. Doctrine later stressed credible minimum deterrence and no first use as official grammar.
- Sanctions followed, then a slow return through the United States civil nuclear bargain.
Partial integration without NPT accession
- The 2008 NSG waiver allowed civil nuclear commerce with a non-NPT State, a unique carve-out.
- IAEA safeguards on civilian facilities, a waiver not a membership flip.
- India seeks NSG membership and backs a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty in principle while rejecting the NPT as it stands.
Role in the order
- India is a de facto nuclear-weapon State that defends a rules-based order it did not join on 1968 terms.
- It supports non-proliferation to others, a tension critics call selective.
- China remains the main nuclear neighbour; Pakistan is the paired deterrent problem.
Continuity
- Disarmament rhetoric never fully vanished. Practice is deterrence plus civil nuclear energy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NPT[NPT 1968 refused] --> P1[Pokhran 1974] P1 --> P2[Pokhran 1998] P2 --> NSG[NSG waiver 2008] NSG --> R[De facto NW State outside NPT]
Conclusion
India’s nuclear role evolved from NPT holdout and 1974 tester to 1998 weapon State and 2008 NSG-exception partner. It wants order without accepting a permanent second-class legal status. That is the through-line.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Will India join the NPT as a weapon State?
The treaty has no such door. India will not join as a non-weapon State. That impasse is the order’s Indian problem.
-
Did the NSG waiver make India a member?
No. It is a trade exception. Membership remains a separate, China-sensitive bid.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"During the Cold War, the Non-Aligned Movement tried to become a Third force in World Politics, but failed because it was too large and unwieldy." Discuss -
2023 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Account for the rise of European Union as a highly influential regional organisation -
2023 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future? -
2023 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India - Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment -
2022 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine the rise of People's Republic of China (PRC) as a great power and its implications on Asian Political order -
2022 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the significance of Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement (BECA) for Indo-US strategic relations. -
2021 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the decline of the United States of America as a hegemon and its implications for the changing international political order -
2021 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain India's relations with the European Union in the context of Brexit
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.