Revision summary
Soviet aid and UN positions created early trust inside non-alignment. The 1971 treaty and Bangladesh war are the political peak. Defence and dual-use science made cooperation sticky. 1991 preserved the pipeline under a weaker Russia. Diversification toward the United States and Russia’s China tie are the current tests.
Model answer
Introduction
India and Russia, and earlier the Soviet Union, built an unusually thick partnership for two States that were not formal allies until 1971. Trust grew from arms, industry, and a diplomatic veto when the West tilted the other way. Cooperation outlived the USSR, with more caveats.
Body
Early decades
- Nehru’s non-alignment still found Moscow willing to industrialise the public sector: steel, energy, and defence licences.
- The UN and Kashmir debates often saw Soviet positions closer to India’s than Western ones.
- Trust was strategic, not sentimental: each used the other inside bipolarity.
The 1971 hinge
- The Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation was the legal peak of trust.
- In the Bangladesh war the Soviet Union backed India diplomatically, including at the Security Council, against a US–China–Pakistan alignment.
- That episode is the historical capital both sides still spend.
Defence and technology
- MiGs, later Sukhois, a nuclear submarine lease, and BrahMos as a joint venture made Russia the staple of Indian inventories.
- Space and nuclear civil cooperation added scientific trust when Western regimes denied dual-use goods after Pokhran.
After 1991
- The Russian Federation kept the defence pipeline. India paid bills and sought spare parts through a collapsed industry.
- A strategic partnership was declared. Annual summits became habit.
- The relationship had to live with India’s United States opening and Russia’s China opening.
Trust under strain, cooperation still real
- Delayed platforms, price renegotiations, and CAATSA-type US pressure test the old monopoly.
- On Afghanistan and some UN votes, interests still often rhyme.
- Energy, including later discounted oil, shows commercial cooperation adapting to a harsher order.
- Trust is path-dependent: militaries that train on Russian kits cannot switch in a five-year plan.
How to judge the history
- It is one of the few great-power ties India did not have to reset after a war with that power.
- It is cooperation with a declining then returning Russia, not an equal concert forever.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD S[Soviet industry UN] --> T[Trust] TR[1971 treaty Bangladesh] --> T D[Defence space nuclear] --> C[Cooperation] T --> P[Partnership after 1991] C --> P US[India-US and Russia-China] -.strains.-> P
Conclusion
India–Russia history is trust built on Soviet industrial and 1971 diplomatic backing, then cooperation in defence and space that survived 1991. The bond is real and thinning at the edges as both diversify. The 1971 treaty remains the emblem, not the whole inventory.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the Sustainable Development Goals as set by the United Nations
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Was India a Soviet ally?
Not in NATO’s sense until the 1971 treaty’s wartime meaning. Even then India kept NAM language.
-
Does the Quad kill the Russia tie?
It complicates it. Inventories, energy, and UN habits keep a residual specialness that Quad does not legally cancel.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China? -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India? -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy. -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.