Revision summary
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Model answer
Introduction
The Soviet collapse removed a Marxist-Leninist superpower. It did not remove class, capital, or hierarchy from world politics. The Marxist approach lost a State. It did not lose its questions.
Body
Why the obituaries were written
- Francis Fukuyama’s end-of-history mood treated liberal capitalism as the only remaining script.
- Realists such as Kenneth Waltz had never needed class. Bipolarity’s end seemed to vindicate States and polarity, not Lenin.
- Official Marxism-as-bloc failed in 1989–91. That failure is real.
Why the approach still travels
- Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system did not depend on the USSR remaining a pole. Core–periphery trade and finance continued.
- Robert Cox asked whose order institutions serve. WTO, IMF, and TRIPS still look like that question, not like a classless market.
- V. I. Lenin’s imperialism thesis is crude as a 1916 map. Monopoly, uneven development, and military projection of capital remain research problems.
- 2008, global value chains, and a capitalist China inside the WTO are puzzles Marxism can pose. Liberal IR often treats them as technical.
Judgment
- Relevance is not prediction of a world revolution. It is a critical map of hierarchy that post–Cold War IR still needs.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CW[Cold War end] --> L[Loss of Soviet Marxism] M[Marx Wallerstein Cox] --> H[Capital and hierarchy] H --> IR[Still relevant IR] L -.does not erase.-> H
Conclusion
Marxist IR lost a geopolitical sponsor after the Cold War. It did not lose relevance as a theory of capital, class, and world hierarchy. Waltz explains poles. Wallerstein and Cox still explain who works for whom.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What measures have been undertaken by the United Nations for its reforms?
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Marxism fail because the USSR failed?
State socialism failed as a development and freedom project. Capitalist hierarchy did not vanish with the CPSU.
-
Is China a Marxist success in IR?
It is a powerful capitalist State in the world-economy. That fact is more Wallerstein than a proof of Lenin’s party-State.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics. -
2024 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the interpretive approach to the study of comparative politics. -
2024 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the central tenets of the World-Systems Theory. -
2024 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the various facets of the idealist approach to the study of international relations. Comment on its contemporary relevance. -
2023 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
In what ways does the functionalist approach in International relations help in maintaining peace and order in global politics? -
2022 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What measures have been undertaken by the United Nations for its reforms?
United Nations: Envisaged role and actual record; specialized UN agencies
Annan-era packages and the 2005 Summit are the main reform waves. HRC, Peacebuilding Commission, R2P, and SDGs are concrete measures. Assembly revitalisation and Council working-method notes are process reforms. Permanent-seat and veto change has not occurred. Reform is real at the margins and blocked at the Charter’s core.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.