Revision summary
The EU grew from the 1951 coal and steel pool to a union of law, market, and for many members a currency. Mitrany and Haas explain the method of task integration and spillover. Market size and regulation give the Union influence beyond its members. Enlargement spread that legal order eastward. Military dependence on NATO and internal splits cap that influence.
Model answer
Introduction
The European Union rose from a coal-and-steel pool among six States to a union with a single market, a currency for many members, and a dense legal order. Influence comes from market size, law, and a method of pooling sovereignty that other regions have not copied at the same depth.
Body
Historical rise
- The Schuman Plan and the European Coal and Steel Community (1951) tied French and German heavy industry after two world wars.
- The Treaty of Rome (1957) created a common market. The Single European Act and the Maastricht Treaty (1992) added political union language, a path to the euro, and a common foreign and security policy in name.
- Enlargement after 1993 and 2004 spread EU law across Central and Eastern Europe. The Lisbon Treaty (2007) adjusted institutions after that growth.
Why it became influential
- Functionalist and neofunctionalist logic, from Mitrany and Haas, fits the early decades: trade and regulation spilled into more policies.
- The single market sets product, data, and competition rules that exporters worldwide must meet. That is regulatory influence, sometimes called the Brussels effect.
- The euro, the European Central Bank, and a large aid and trade network give the Union weight in the IMF, WTO, and climate talks.
- Internally it is a security community. Externally it is a civilian power that still relies on NATO for hard defence, which is a limit as well as a condition of its rise.
Limits that still sit inside the account
- Brexit showed that pooling is reversible in politics if not easily in law.
- Disagreement on migration, fiscal union, and Ukraine-war energy policy shows that influence is not the same as a single State.
- For Waltz, the EU does not cancel anarchy among great powers. For Keohane, it is the densest regime complex in the system.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD S[ECSC Rome Maastricht] --> M[Single market euro law] M --> I[Global regulatory influence] N[NATO hard security] -.external condition.-> I
Conclusion
The EU rose through task-based integration, enlargement, and a single market whose rules travel. It is highly influential as a regulatory and economic union. It is less so as a military actor, which is part of the same history.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q4(c)). View answer →
-
Is the EU a State?
No. It is a union of States with pooled sovereignty in many fields and retained national control in others, especially taxation and armies.
-
Did functionalism alone create the EU?
No. United States security, Cold War politics, and French–German bargains were conditions. Functional method describes how integration thickened.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
The changing global order and ongoing regional conflicts, with the global powers taking sides, have jeopardized the progress made towards disarmament in the past. Comment. -
2024 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Do you agree with the view that the USA uses NATO as a traditional tool of strategy to perpetuate its hegemony in the world? -
2024 · Q8(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the implications of the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime with Myanmar by the Indian Government on the complex ethno-political dynamics of the north-eastern region. -
2023 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"During the Cold War, the Non-Aligned Movement tried to become a Third force in World Politics, but failed because it was too large and unwieldy." Discuss -
2023 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future? -
2023 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India - Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment -
2022 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine the rise of People's Republic of China (PRC) as a great power and its implications on Asian Political order -
2022 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the significance of Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement (BECA) for Indo-US strategic relations.
More from this topic
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
India's reluctance to perceive any 'existential threat' inevitably made the multilateral path to nuclear security a 'default option' until it decided to cross nuclear Rubicon in 1998. Identify and analyze some of the major reasons behind this shift in India's position on the nuclear question
Changing International Political Order
India’s early nuclear path mixed scientific capacity with moral multilateralism and a recessed 1974 PNE. NPT hierarchy, NSG sanctions and CTBT’s closing window turned the default into a cage. China’s arsenal and Pakistan’s weapons-plus-proxy mix supplied the security case for 1998. Vajpayee’s government supplied the political will; status mixed with deterrence. 1998 was admission that survival could no longer be outsourced to a disarming great-power club.
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Does the Non-Aligned Movement have any future in the wake of India's growing indifference towards it?
Changing International Political Order
NAM was India’s bipolar-era instrument: Belgrade 1961, refuse camps, keep voice. Delhi now practises multi-alignment and invests in G20, Quad and 2+2s more than in NAM theatre. Indifference is real because India was NAM’s engine; without it the Movement thins. A future remains as a Global South UN-and-development caucus, not as Cold War neutrality. Verdict: damaged as Indian doctrine, not automatically dead as a membership habit.
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the implications of the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime with Myanmar by the Indian Government on the complex ethno-political dynamics of the north-eastern region.
Changing International Political Order
The FMR let border highland communities cross a short distance because Naga, Chin, Kuki and Mizo kin were split by the India–Myanmar line. Delhi’s restriction is driven by insurgent sanctuaries, narcotics, post-2021 refugees and Manipur’s 2023 conflict. Security gains are possible in counting and fencing. Ethno-political costs fall on hill kinship, humanitarian Chin-Kuki links and Naga cross-border society. A harder border can also empower illegal brokers if political settlement on both sides is absent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.