Revision summary
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Model answer
Introduction
The political economy approach studies power and wealth together. Comparative politics is not only constitutions and votes. It is how States, classes, and markets shape one another across countries.
Body
What the approach claims
- Politics allocates scarce resources. Economics sets who can organise and who must obey.
- Karl Marx treated the mode of production as the deep structure of the State. Later writers kept the link without always keeping revolution.
- Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system places each State in a core, semi-periphery, or periphery. Comparison then starts from position in a capitalist world-economy, not from isolated national cultures.
How it differs from other maps
- Gabriel Almond’s structural-functionalism compared roles and political culture. Political economy asks who owns, who taxes, and who is dependent on foreign capital.
- Behavioural surveys can miss class, land, oil, and aid. Dependency writers treated those as the real independent variables.
- Hamza Alavi’s overdeveloped post-colonial State is a political-economy claim: the colonial bureaucracy and army stand over a weak indigenous bourgeoisie.
What it helps compare
- Why some democracies tax capital lightly, why militaries run industrial policy, and why welfare arrived late in labour-surplus societies.
- Why India, a large home market, and a small commodity exporter do not travel the same path even if both are labelled developing.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PE[Political economy] --> C[Class and capital] PE --> W[Wallerstein world-system] PE --> S[State tax and force] C --> X[Comparative politics] W --> X S --> X
Conclusion
The political economy approach compares States as organisers of production, class, and external dependence. Almond’s functions still describe institutions. They do not replace class, capital, and world-system position as causes.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does political economy ignore elections?
No. It asks which classes and firms elections empower, and how campaign money and land shape the vote.
-
Is this only Marxism?
Marx is a source. Liberal PE and institutional economics also compare property, tax, and trade as political facts.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain -
2021 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emergence of neo-realism and its basic tenets -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries -
2021 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What is globalisation? Why is there an intense debate about globalisation and its consequences? -
2021 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? -
2021 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the success of ASEAN as a regional organisation -
2021 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Write about the growing significance of QUAD. -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What measures have been undertaken by the United Nations for its reforms?
United Nations: Envisaged role and actual record; specialized UN agencies
Annan-era packages and the 2005 Summit are the main reform waves. HRC, Peacebuilding Commission, R2P, and SDGs are concrete measures. Assembly revitalisation and Council working-method notes are process reforms. Permanent-seat and veto change has not occurred. Reform is real at the margins and blocked at the Charter’s core.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.