Revision summary
The political is not one object but a set of meanings used in political theory. Easton’s meaning is the authoritative allocation of values, illustrated by budgets, courts, and elections. Aristotle and Arendt treat the political as public speech and action among citizens, illustrated by assemblies and satyagraha. Marx, Schmitt, Dahl, and Gramsci treat it as organised power, conflict, decision, and hegemony. Feminist theory and movements such as anti-arrack show that the public–private boundary itself is a political question.
Model answer
Introduction
- The word political does not name one object. It names a family of meanings: the public allocation of values, the life of the polis, the contest for power, and the drawing of a line between public and private. To elucidate those meanings with illustrations is to show why students of political theory cannot treat the term as self-evident.
Body
Authoritative allocation
David Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values for a society. A budget that funds a scheme and denies another, a court that upholds a right, and an election that authorises a cabinet are political in this sense. The illustration is ordinary government. What makes the act political is not passion but authority that binds.
The polis and public action
For Aristotle, the political is the life of the polis, where speech about justice is possible among citizens. Hannah Arendt recovered action and plurality: politics is appearing before others in a public space, not the household’s labour and not the craftsman’s making. Parliament, a Gram Sabha after the 73rd Amendment, and a satyagraha meeting are illustrations. A closed family decision is, on this map, not yet political.
Power, conflict, and the state
Realists and Marx treat the political as organised power and conflict. Carl Schmitt made the friend–enemy distinction the criterion of the political. War, party cleavage, and class struggle illustrate this darker sense. Dahl’s decisions and Gramsci’s hegemony both belong here: politics is who prevails and whose common sense rules.
Boundary work
Feminist theory, and Carole Pateman in particular, showed that calling the household pre-political hid male power. The slogan that the personal is political does not mean that every feeling is a statute. It means that marriage law, unpaid care, and domestic violence are already organised by public power. India’s anti-arrack movement in Andhra Pradesh illustrated that a ‘private’ liquor economy was a public injury to women.
Liberal theory still needs a public–private distinction so that conscience is not fully administered. The political, then, is also the activity of drawing that line: what the state may command, and what it may not.
A working set of meanings
- One may therefore say: the political is (i) authoritative allocation, (ii) civic public action, (iii) organised power and conflict, and (iv) the contest over the public–private boundary. Locke’s civil government, Rawls’s basic structure, and Habermas’s public sphere each emphasise a different member of this set. Illustrations should be matched to the meaning in use, or debate talks past itself.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD POL[Political] --> E[Easton allocation] POL --> A[Aristotle / Arendt public] POL --> P[Power and conflict] POL --> B[Public-private boundary] B --> F[Feminist illustration]
Conclusion
The term political means authoritative allocation, public civic action, organised power, and the drawing of the public–private line. Easton, Aristotle, Arendt, Marx, Schmitt, Dahl, Gramsci, and feminist theory name these senses. Clear writing states which meaning is in play and illustrates it, rather than treating political as a single undefined atmosphere.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Marxism is a political theory of action demanding strict compliance with its core principles. Comment.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Is every social issue political?
On the feminist and Eastonian maps, an issue becomes political when it is bound by public authority or when the public–private line is itself contested. Not every private preference is a political act.
-
Why does Schmitt’s friend–enemy criterion matter?
It shows a meaning of the political as existential conflict. Liberal theory rejects making that the whole of politics, but it names a real limit case of power.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Provide a comparative analysis of behavioural and institutional approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain how the slogan 'the personal is political' addresses the issue of women's oppression and discrimination? -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Do you think that legitimacy acquired by consent or manufactured by indoctrination is an essential element in maintenance of political rule? Justify your answer with relevant examples -
2025 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Delineate the key factors that have shaped the evolving political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir post 2019 -
2025 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Caste remains a vital axis for political mobilisation in India. How would the caste census address the aspirations of people? Discuss -
2025 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science.
Political Theory
The behavioural approach studies observable political behaviour, attitudes, and systems rather than constitutions alone. Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values in a system of demand, support, and output. Dahl tested power through actual decisions; Almond and Verba linked democracy to civic culture. The method is empirical, comparative, and often quantitative. Post-behavioural and institutional critics restored justice, the state, and rules that surveys cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State.
Theories of the State
Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution.
Political Theory
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.