Q1(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Decline of political theory.

Topic: Political Theory. Syllabus: Political Theory: meaning and approaches. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and Political Theory.

Revision summary

Decline of political theory was a mid-century claim that systematic normative argument had stopped. Laslett, Cobban, positivism, and Easton’s behavioural programme were the main sources of that claim. Easton’s 1969 credo of relevance and Rawls’s 1971 book reopened normative theory. Sandel, Walzer, Berlin, Arendt, and Foucault continued theory under other names. The thesis described a university mood, not the end of political thought in India or elsewhere.

Model answer

Introduction

  • The phrase decline of political theory named a mid-twentieth-century diagnosis: that systematic argument about the good regime had given way to history of ideas, ideology, or behavioural science. The diagnosis was later revised when Rawls and others rebuilt normative theory.

Body

What was said to decline

  • Peter Laslett wrote in 1956 that political philosophy was dead for the moment, because no one was doing the old systematic work.
  • Alfred Cobban and others blamed ideology, war, and a retreat into historical scholarship.
  • David Easton in 1951 criticised traditional political theory as unscientific and called for a behavioural science of systems.
  • Logical positivism treated value statements as not empirically meaningful, which starved normative argument.
  • The result, on this account, was either empty legalism or survey research without justice.

What returned

  • Easton’s own 1969 post-behavioural address demanded relevance, which reopened values as a public problem.
  • John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice (1971) restored contract argument at a high analytic level.
  • Berlin, Arendt, Oakeshott, and later Sandel and Walzer showed that concepts of liberty, action, and community were still live.
  • Foucault and post-colonial writers shifted the object of theory to power and empire rather than ending theory.
  • Indian constitutional argument after Kesavananda Bharati (1973) continued a public theory of limits on power.

How to read “decline”

  • Decline named a professional mood in Anglo-American universities, not the end of political thought in the world.
  • Ambedkar, Gandhi, and Aurobindo were already doing political theory in another idiom while the decline thesis was written in England.
  • The accurate statement is interruption and specialisation, then revival, not a completed death.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  D[Decline thesis] --> L[Laslett Cobban]
  D --> E[Easton behavioural]
  R[Revival] --> RW[Rawls 1971]
  R --> C[Sandel Walzer]
  E --> P[1969 relevance]

Conclusion

Decline of political theory referred to a mid-century gap between behavioural science and systematic normative argument. Easton first widened the gap and then asked for relevance. Rawls, communitarians, and constitutional courts show that the gap did not remain.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Success of contemporary democracies lies in the State limiting its own power. Explain

    Next question in the 2023 paper (Q2). View answer →

  • Did political theory actually stop?

    It thinned in some universities as a systematic subject. History of ideas, ideology, and extra-European thought continued.

  • Was behaviouralism the only cause?

    No. War, ideology, and positivist suspicion of values also mattered. Behaviouralism was the most organised academic cause.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Normative approach in Political Science.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Multicultural perspective on rights.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    State of Nature as State of War (Hobbes).

    View answer →

  4. 2023 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks

    Success of contemporary democracies lies in the State limiting its own power. Explain

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    'Credo of Relevance' in post-behaviouralism advocates the importance of action science. Analyze

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    "The legal subordination of one sex to another is wrong in itself, and now one of the chief hindrances to human development." (J. S. Mill). Comment

    View answer →

  7. 2022 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Systems Approach.

    View answer →

  8. 2022 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Cultural Relativism.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

Normative approach in Political Science.

Political Theory

The normative approach asks what political life ought to be and argues about justice, liberty, and obligation. Plato, Aristotle, the contract theorists, Mill, and Rawls are central practitioners. Easton and Dahl supply empirical maps of systems and decisions that cannot replace the question of right. Communitarian critics warn that abstract persons can hide real communities. Indian Parts III and IV show that a constitution is itself a public set of ought-statements.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

Multicultural perspective on rights.

Political Theory

Multicultural theory treats culture as a condition of using liberty, not as a private hobby. Kymlicka, Taylor, Parekh, and Walzer argue for recognition and, in some cases, group rights. Indian Articles 25 to 30 and linguistic states are the constitutional form of that argument. Ambedkar’s Article 17 and sex-equality limits block a group veto over civil liberty. The perspective fails if it either ignores minorities or traps persons inside the group.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

State of Nature as State of War (Hobbes).

Political Theory

Hobbes’s state of nature is a state of war: a condition of known readiness to fight where there is no common power. Competition, diffidence, and glory are the three causes of quarrel. Natural equality of vulnerability makes pre-emptive violence rational. The sovereign ends the war by monopolising judgment and force. Locke, Mill, and constitutional democracy keep a common power and then limit it, which Hobbes refused as a right against the sovereign.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.