Should India ban encrypted apps?

A total ban also blinds business and honest users and pushes handlers to new tools. Targeted intercept on a warrant and platform cooperation are the better guideline.

Is an internet shutdown the best riot tool?

A short, lawful, local restriction can slow a rumour spike. A long Statewide shutdown also stops police coordination and livelihood, and it should be a last step, not the first.

Use of internet and social media by non-state actors for subversive activities

Revision summary

Open summary Close summary

Terror groups and riot organisers use social media to recruit, instruct, raise funds, and spread rumour. The 2012 North-East exodus rumours and ISIS-style online radicalisation are clear recent misuses. Lawful blocking, UAPA, and IT Act intercept powers must stay narrow after the 66A judgment. Platforms need log preservation and fast removal of unlawful content on a legal order. Literacy, counter-speech, and financial tracking beat a long blanket internet shutdown.

Model answer

Introduction

Phones and social platforms let a non-State actor — a terror group, a riot organiser, a hostile intelligence proxy, or a criminal gang — reach millions without a radio station. Recruitment, rumour, and live attack coordination now travel on the same apps as family chat. That is a major internal-security concern. The answer must name how the tools were misused and then offer guidelines that target crime, not the ordinary political speech the Supreme Court protected when it struck down Section 66A in 2015.

Body

How the tools are misused

Recruitment and radicalisation: polished videos and private chat pull a youth from grievance to a module; ISIS and other groups industrialised this after 2014.
Instruction and operational security: bomb-making notes, encryption, and dead-drop accounts replace a physical handler.
Rumour as a weapon: fake images of violence can start a riot or a flight of people, as in the 2012 North-East exodus rumours on SMS and social media.
Communal incitement: forwarded clips, often old or foreign, timed for a procession or an election.
Fundraising: online wallets, charities that are fronts, and publicity for kidnappings.
Live terror: attackers on the move using phones for media and for handlers, as seen in several urban assaults worldwide and in Indian investigations after 26/11-era plots.
Cyber crime overlap: phishing and malware to fund or to steal data from officials.
Separatist and insurgent propaganda aimed at the diaspora and at local youth in Kashmir and the North-East.

Recent-past illustrations

Global jihadist use of Twitter, YouTube, and Telegram-style channels for brand and for lone-wolf calls.
Indian cases of modules busted with Facebook and WhatsApp trails; police often find the handler abroad.
Mass rumour moving faster than a district’s public-address system.
Use of virtual private networks and foreign servers to sit outside easy summons.

Effective guidelines to curb the threat

Law with a narrow aim: use Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Information Technology Act blocking and interception powers (sections 69 and 69A), and ordinary IPC offences against incitement — with judicial or high-level executive oversight so the 66A-era vagueness does not return.
Intermediary rules: time-bound removal of unlawful content on a lawful order; a local office and a compliance officer for large platforms; preservation of logs for investigation. Do not demand a general pre-censorship of all speech.
CERT-In, NTRO, and State cyber cells that share indicators of compromise and of terror handles in hours, not months.
Open-source and undercover capability in police, with language skills, instead of only a blocking request.
Financial trails: freeze wallets and hawala that sit behind the page; involve the Financial Intelligence Unit.
Counter-speech: official fact pages during a rumour spike; community voices that are trusted in that town, not only a Delhi press release.
Digital literacy in schools and madrasas and through the police beat: how to spot a fake video, whom to call.
Crisis protocol: when a riot clip spreads, district magistrate, police, and platforms on one call; targeted restriction if a court or statute allows, rather than a long, blanket shutdown that also blinds the honest citizen and the police.
International cooperation: Budapest Convention-type mutual assistance, and requests to firms that store data abroad.
Prison and probation: monitor known radicalisers’ accounts; deradicalisation that is more than a locked SIM.
Protect encryption for the honest user while using targeted lawful intercept on identified suspects — a mass backdoor is itself a security hole.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  NSA[Non-state actors] --> NET[Internet social media]
  NET --> MIS[Recruit rumour finance ops]
  LAW[UAPA IT Act 69 69A] --> CURB[Curb threat]
  PLAT[Intermediary takedown logs] --> CURB
  SOC[Literacy counter-speech FIU] --> CURB

Conclusion

Non-State actors have used the internet to recruit, to riot through rumour, to raise money, and to run operations. Indian rumour panics and global jihadist media are the recent proof. Guidelines that work are precise law, platform compliance, cyber fusion, money trails, counter-speech, and literacy — not a return to vague speech crimes or a permanent blackout. Curb the handler and the lie; keep the citizen online.

Quick related

Students also ask

The nature of economic growth in India in recent times is often described as a jobless growth. Do you agree with this view? Give arguments in favour of your answer.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q1). View answer →
Should India ban encrypted apps?

A total ban also blinds business and honest users and pushes handlers to new tools. Targeted intercept on a warrant and platform cooperation are the better guideline.
Is an internet shutdown the best riot tool?

A short, lawful, local restriction can slow a rumour spike. A long Statewide shutdown also stops police coordination and livelihood, and it should be a last step, not the first.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.

Use of internet and social media by non-state actors for subversive activities is a major security concern. How have these been misused in the recent past? Suggest effective guidelines to curb the above threat.