Q7(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q6 Q7 →

Elucidate the shifting terrains of India's tribal policies in colonial and post-colonial periods.

Topic: The concept of ethnicity. Syllabus: 7.3 The concept of ethnicity; Ethnic conflicts and political developments; Unrest among tribal communities; Regionalism and demand for autonomy; Pseudo-tribalism. Social change among the tribes during colonial and post-Independent India. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and The concept of ethnicity.

Revision summary

Colonial tribal policy combined military pacification, Forest Acts, Inner Line, and excluded areas. Santal Hul and Birsa’s movement show the cost of that terrain. Post-colonial policy began with Fifth and Sixth Schedules and Nehru–Elwin Panchsheel. ITDPs and dams made development the new terrain, often without consent. PESA, FRA, Samata, and Xaxa mark a rights language that still fights the older forest estate.

Model answer

Introduction

Tribal policy in India is the state’s method of ruling forest and hill peoples. Colonial policy moved from conquest and forest reservation to scheduled districts. Post-colonial policy moved from Nehru–Elwin protection toward integration, development, and then rights law. The terrain shifts; land pressure does not vanish.

Body

Colonial terrains

  • Early Company rule treated many hills as military frontiers (Bhils, Santhals, Nagas). Rebellions — Santal Hul (1855), Birsa Munda (1899–1900), Rampa — were answered with troops and then special laws.
  • Scheduled Districts Act, 1874, Inner Line (1873), and later Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas under the Government of India Act, 1935, created a separate administrative terrain: the officer, not the ordinary province, as the hinge.
  • Indian Forest Act, 1878 and 1927, made forest a state estate. Jhum and hunting became offences. This was the deepest economic shift.
  • Ethnography served the handbook: Risley, Hutton, Mills, Gurdon. Verrier Elwin as a late colonial and early independent adviser already argued against sudden assimilation.
  • G. S. Ghurye in the 1940s opposed isolation and wanted absorption as backward Hindus.

Post-colonial terrains

  • Constitution: Fifth and Sixth Schedules, Articles 15, 16, 46, 244, 275, 330–342, Inner Line retained. Nehru’s tribal Panchsheel and Elwin’s NEFA philosophy were the protective idiom.
  • Development decades: community development, ITDPs after the Dhebar Commission, Tribal Sub-Plan, Ashram schools. The terrain became the project and the hostel.
  • Displacement: dams, mines, and industry treated tribal land as empty. This contradicted Panchsheel in practice.
  • Rights turn: PESA 1996, FRA 2006, Samata 1997, Niyamgiri, Xaxa Committee 2014, PoA Act for ST. Policy language shifted from welfare to consent and title.
  • Security turn in some belts: AFSPA, camps, and surrender policies sit beside FRA, a split terrain.

What shifted

  • From superintendent’s discretion to constitutional lists and courts.
  • From isolation versus assimilation as a binary to a mixed toolkit: Schedule plus school plus mine.

What did not

  • Forest and mineral hunger. Xaxa said the colonial forest estate still structures the post-colonial project.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Colonial] --> F[Forest Act excluded areas]
  C --> R[Rebellion then schedule]
  P[Post-colonial] --> N[Panchsheel Schedules]
  P --> D[ITDP dams mines]
  P --> T[PESA FRA courts]
  D --> X[Dispossession continues]

Conclusion

Colonial policy scheduled the hills and reserved the forest. Post-colonial policy added citizenship, Panchsheel, then PESA and FRA. The shift is from subject to rights-bearing ST. The continuing terrain is dispossession unless Gram Sabha power is real.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Regionalism and Autonomy

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Impact of urbanization and industrialization on tribal communities of India.

    View answer →

  3. 2025 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the rising ethnic conflicts in India and propose their possible remedial measures

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the economic, social, and developmental impacts on tribal communities with special reference to mining.

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Distinguishing between ethnic identity and ethnicity, discuss the factors responsible for ethnic conflict in tribal areas.

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    The role that regionalism plays in demand for autonomy among Indian tribes

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Rights over resources and tribal unrest.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Material culture and archaeology

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Jajmani system : continuity and change

Caste system in India

Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.