Revision summary
Hydro dams submerge the river commons that tribal women use for fish, fodder, fuel, and flood-recession farming. Compensation usually follows the male household head, so women lose title and natal networks. Baviskar and NBA work on Sardar Sarovar document Bhilala, Tadvi, and Vasava women’s losses and resistance. Lower Subansiri affects Mising and Arunachal hill women through flood pulse, safety, and labour camps. Polavaram, Hirakud, Tehri, and Mapithel show the same gendered pattern beyond one river.
Model answer
Introduction
Large hydroelectric dams flood fields, groves, and river fisheries. Tribal women in those valleys lose the resources they actually use — water, minor forest produce, and kin networks — faster than compensation lists record. The local context is gendered even when the project speaks of “project-affected families” in the male head’s name.
Body
What dams do to a tribal household
- Submergence removes jal, jungle, jameen. Women who collected fuel, fodder, fish, and mahua or tendu lose daily income that never appeared as a patta.
- Resettlement sites are often upland, treeless, and far from kin. MGNREGA or wage work may increase, but it is not the same as a river commons.
- Compensation and house plots are usually titled to men. Women become dependents in a new village without natal or marital grove rights.
Sardar Sarovar and the Narmada
- Sardar Sarovar on the Narmada displaced Bhil, Bhilala, Tadvi, Vasava, and related groups in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Madhya Pradesh.
- Amita Baviskar (In the Belly of the River) described Bhilala life at the river and the moral economy that the reservoir broke.
- Narmada Bachao Andolan (Medha Patkar and local women satyagrahis) made women’s bodies the public face of resistance — water rising in the satyagraha at the dam site — because women stayed when men migrated.
- Health: more distance to water, more vector disease in some colonies, and loss of river protein. Girls’ labour rose as fuel walks lengthened before the move and then as new-site domestic scarcity.
- Bina Srinivasan and NBA documentation recorded that “land for land” often failed women because they were not recorded as cultivators.
Subansiri and the eastern Himalaya
- The Lower Subansiri project (Assam–Arunachal) sits in Mising, Galo, Nyishi, and other downstream and hill catchments. Women in Mising riverine villages depend on the flood pulse for fishing and paddy.
- Fear of dam-break, changed flooding, and outsider labour camps affects women’s safety and mobility. Local protests (including after the 2011 earthquake debates on dam safety) were not only male student unions.
- Elwin’s NEFA worry returns: a road and a dam arrive faster than a woman’s say in Gram Sabha or village council.
Other real cases
- Tehri (Garhwal) displaced hill Hindu and some tribal-adjacent cultivators; women lost terraced fields and walked farther for water in New Tehri’s early years.
- Hirakud (Odisha) and later Polavaram (Andhra–Odisha–Chhattisgarh) hit Gond, Koya, Konda Reddi and others; women’s forest collection was rarely compensated.
- Mapithel / Thoubal (Manipur) and Tipaimukh debates show hill women opposing dams that drown jhum and village graves.
- Indira Sagar and Omkareshwar (Narmada cascade) repeated Sardar Sarovar’s gendered title problem.
Critical point
- Hydroelectricity is framed as national clean power. Locally it is a gendered dispossession. Anthropology should count women’s commons, not only the male acre on the award list.
- PESA and FRA require consent; many dam clearances still treat women as family members, not as rights-holders.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Hydro dam] --> F[Flood fields groves fisheries] F --> W[Women lose commons] C[Compensation to male head] --> W R[Resettlement] --> H[Health water safety]
Conclusion
Dam displacement hits tribal women through lost commons, male-titled compensation, longer water and fuel work, and broken kin support. Sardar Sarovar’s Bhilala and Tadvi women, Mising riverine households below Subansiri, and Koya women at Polavaram are the ethnographic record. A project that does not title women and replace the river commons fails them even when a house is built.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elucidate the role of anthropology in nation building. Illustrate with suitable examples.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
If a family gets a house, is the woman rehabilitated?
Not if she lost unrecorded commons, kin support, and independent income. A house in a male name can increase dependence.
-
Why are dams harder on women than on men in these valleys?
Men more often hold the patta and can migrate for wages. Women stay with children and depend on the river and forest that the reservoir erases.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the objectives of Integrated Tribal Development Projects (ITDPs). How far have these objectives been achieved? -
2021 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the impact of the Forest Rights Act (2006) on the livelihood and culture of tribal people in India -
2021 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the problems involved in rehabilitation and resettlement of tribals displaced due to development projects in India -
2015 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Recently non-government organizations have been critiqued for interfering with developmental process in tribal heartland ! Critically comment
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jajmani system : continuity and change
Caste system in India
Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.