Revision summary
Chipko was 1970s Himalayan resistance to commercial felling, led in key actions by village women. Its Gandhian tone was non-violence, moral pressure and local control of livelihood resources. Climate politics now rereads forests as sinks, sponges and gendered commons. The movement names contractors and the state, which is climate justice in local form. It is a teaching case, not a complete national climate plan.
Model answer
Introduction
Chipko began in the 1970s Uttarakhand hills as villagers, many of them women, hugged trees to stop commercial felling. Its Gandhian tone was non-violence, local swaraj over livelihood, and moral claim on the state. Global climate concern now rereads that local forest defence as an early climate politics of care, carbon, and commons.
Body
What Chipko was
- The movement grew from hill economy: forests as fodder, fuel, water sponge, and landslide shield, not as timber volume for contractors.
- Gaura Devi’s Reni action, and the organising work of Chandi Prasad Bhatt and Sunderlal Bahuguna, made a village method nationally visible.
- It was not a city NGO first. It was agrarian and gendered resistance, which Desai’s class lens can still hold: who owns the forest surplus.
The Gandhian tone
- Satyagraha without arms, constructive local organisation, and an appeal to the conscience of rulers echo Gandhi’s repertoire.
- Bahuguna’s fasts and marches used the body as argument, as Gandhi had done.
- The tone is also village swaraj: those who live with the forest should decide its use, against a distant developmental state.
- It is not a full copy of Gandhi: Chipko spoke ecology more clearly than Hind Swaraj spoke carbon.
Climate relevance today
- Forests as carbon sinks, monsoon regulators, and disaster buffers are now global climate language; Chipko already defended those functions as livelihood.
- Climate justice asks who pays for emissions and who loses the commons; Chipko named contractors and the state, not a nameless Anthropocene.
- Women’s leadership in Chipko prefigures the fact that climate harm is gendered in water, fuel, and care work.
- Narmada later showed the same conflict at dam scale: development versus river people. Chipko remains the forest-scale classic.
Analytical limits
- Chipko cannot be romanticised as a complete climate policy; India still needs energy, jobs, and urban mitigation.
- A Gandhian tone can be ignored by a growth coalition unless law, as in later forest rights debates, records community power.
- Yogendra Singh would see Chipko as orthogenetic ethics meeting a heterogenetic commercial forest regime.
Why the case still teaches
- Climate policy that only trades carbon in cities repeats the contractor logic Chipko fought.
- Non-violent local veto plus scientific hydrology is a usable mix, not a museum of the 1970s.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Hill forest livelihood] --> CH[Chipko hug the tree] G[Gandhian satyagraha swaraj] --> CH CH --> C[Commons against contractors] C --> CL[Climate sinks disaster buffer justice]
Conclusion
Chipko is relevant to climate concern because it defended forests as living commons through Gandhian non-violence and local claim. The climate age needs that sociology of who owns the sink, not only a global temperature number.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What actionable measures would you suggest to curb the recurrent child labour menace in India?
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Was Chipko only about hugging trees?
The hug was a tactic. The demand was control over forest use against commercial extraction.
-
Can Chipko guide climate policy in cities?
Its principle travels: those who live with the risk should have a veto. The tactics will differ in a city.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the significant features of A.R. Desai's 'Dialectical Perspective' to study Indian Society -
2023 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Are Tradition and Modernity antithetical to each other? Comment -
2023 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine the concept of Sanskritization with suitable illustrations -
2023 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Analyse the perspectives of Isolation, Assimilation and Integration in understanding the trajectories of Indian Tribal Development -
2023 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the concept of 'Cultural Pluralism' in the context of India's Unity in Diversity -
2023 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the salient features of the New Education Policy (NEP) 2020 -
2023 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the nature of regional variations in sex ratio in India, stating reasons thereof -
2023 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the phenomenon of rural-urban continuum with suitable examples
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the significant features of A.R. Desai's 'Dialectical Perspective' to study Indian Society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai studies Indian society as historical materialism, not as a harmonious village. Caste and custom are read as ideology over agrarian class. The colonial and planning state are part of the contradiction, not neutral umpires. Village studies of consensus are criticised as incomplete. The method is strong on land, labour, and struggle.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"The decade of 1950s was the golden period of village studies in Indian Sociology." Explain the statement
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The 1950s joined planning, Community Development, and intensive village ethnography. Srinivas, Dube, Marriott, Bailey, Mayer and others built the classic monographs. Dominant caste, factions, and the field view came from this decade. The village was treated as a keyhole to Indian society. Beteille and class analysis later limited that claim.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the differences between the attributional and interactional approach in studying the caste system
Caste System
Attributional caste scores groups by listed traits such as diet, occupation and ritual. Ghurye and colonial lists exemplify that approach. Interactional caste ranks groups by who gives and receives food, service and honour. Marriott, Dumont and Srinivas made interaction the test of hierarchy. Lived rank can diverge from textbook attributes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.