Revision summary
Descent assigns belonging; lineage is the ancestor-traced set. India includes patriliny, matriliny and mixed practices. Seed-and-Earth ideology is not the only Indian rule. Household coresidence often diverges from the genealogical chart. Coorg okka, Kerala taravad and north Indian gotra illustrate the range.
Model answer
Introduction
Lineage and descent in India are concepts for how people trace belonging and property. The issues are that India is not one patrilineal type, and that ideology of the line does not always match the household on the ground.
Body
Concepts
- Descent is the rule that assigns a child to a group. Lineage is a set of persons who trace that rule to an ancestor.
- Patriliny, matriliny, and cognatic mixes all exist. Clan, gotra, and okka are not interchangeable.
Conceptual issues
- Book-view Hindu law privileged male seed, which Dube named Seed and Earth, and treated other systems as exceptions.
- Colonial ethnography froze ‘tribe’ as unilineal custom and ‘caste’ as gotra exogamy, a rigidity Whitehead would see as synecdoche.
- Descent as ideology versus descent as practice: daughters may inherit in law while the lineage still names sons.
- Household is not lineage. A. M. Shah and others showed coresident groups that do not match the genealogical chart.
Illustrations
- Coorg okka: Srinivas’s ancestral house as a patrilineal ritual-property unit.
- Nair taravad in Kerala: matrilineal jointness that colonial and later law recast.
- North Indian gotra exogamy with village virilocality: women leave, the line stays.
- Many Adivasi systems mix clan with village, defying a single ST descent type.
- Urban middle-class families keep gotra on the wedding card and a nuclear household in the flat.
Implication
- Conceptual care stops us from reading all India as one patriarchal clan.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DE[Descent rules] --> PA[Patriliny] DE --> MA[Matriliny] ID[Seed ideology] --> GAP[Practice and household differ]
Conclusion
Lineage and descent in India raise issues of diversity, of ideology versus practice, and of household versus genealogical group. Illustrations from okka, taravad, gotra, and tribal clans show why one Indological line will not do.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Analyze household dimensions of family in India.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is gotra a lineage?
It is often a descent category for marriage, not always a living corporate group.
-
Did law end matriliny?
Statutes and markets weakened many taravads. Practice is historically layered.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the role of market and modern forces in understanding the changing trends in marriage systems in India -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Define the concepts of 'Descent' and 'Alliance'. Differentiate between North Indian and South Indian Kinship systems with examples -
2021 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing dimensions of family structure in urban India -
2020 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Analyze household dimensions of family in India. -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Western patriarchy which surrenders feminine principles is the development project in India. Do you agree with this view? Why? -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the impact of ban on 'Triple Talak' on marriage and divorce among the Muslim community in India. -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Clarify the distinction between "household" and "family" and evaluate Whether joint families have completely disintegrated
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.