Revision summary
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Model answer
Introduction
A. R. Desai studied Indian society as a historically formed class structure, not as a timeless caste temple. His Marxist perspective asks who owns land and capital, and how the state serves that bloc.
Body
Core of the perspective
- Social Background of Indian Nationalism read the national movement as bourgeois-led, with peasants and workers as a mass that elites did not fulfil.
- Rural sociology, for Desai, is malik, kisan, and mazdoor after Thorner, recast as class struggle, not as Srinivas’s functional village.
- The state, planning, and land reform are incomplete bourgeois change: intermediaries fall, rich peasants thicken, labour stays insecure.
Against other Indias
- He rejected Ghurye’s Hindu civilisational whole and Dumont’s purity ideology as the first key.
- Caste and religion matter as they organise exploitation, not as the essence of India.
Limit
- Later subaltern work, after Ranajit Guha, said peasant consciousness is not only class-as-party.
- Gender and tribe need more than a class footnote.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Desai Marxist India] --> C[Class land capital] C --> N[Bourgeois nationalism] C --> R[Incomplete land reform]
Conclusion
- Desai’s perspective is historical materialism applied to India: class, colonial capitalism, and an unfinished bourgeois republic. It is strongest on land and nationalism, and thin if culture is treated as a mask only.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Did Desai deny caste?
He denied caste as the master key. He did not deny graded inequality on the field.
-
Is he only about the past?
Liberalisation and informal labour still fit his unfinished bourgeois India.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society? -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Secularism was an outcome of 20th century humanistic radicalism." Comment on this statement. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Indian caste system is unique and has been unhealthy for the growth of sociology of India." How far do you agree with this view? -
2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Whitehead's contention that caste has potential to displace class and colonial contradiction. -
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
"Indian rural society is a faction-ridden society." Discuss. -
2020 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the consequences and remedies of chronic malnutrition in India. -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Dube's contributions to the study of Indian villages -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is caste politics? Substantiate your answer with examples of how identities are defined by caste dynamics
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the definitional problems concerning the tribal communities in India.
Tribal communities in India
Tribe in India has no single cultural definition. Colonial marks, Ghurye’s Hinduisation and Elwin’s protection compete. Scheduled Tribe is a legal list, not an essence. Some listed groups are peasants; some forest dwellers are unlisted. Definition is a power relation to state and market.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.