Q2(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(e) Q3(b) →

Analyse the role of market and modern forces in understanding the changing trends in marriage systems in India

Topic: Systems of Kinship in India. Syllabus: Systems of Kinship in India: Lineage and descent in India; Types of kinship systems; Family and marriage in India; Household dimensions of the family; Patriarchy, entitlements and sexual division of labour. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and Systems of Kinship in India.

Revision summary

Matrimonial markets often reinforce caste filters while changing how matches are found. Dowry and wedding display follow credential and consumption markets. Law, education and migration widen conjugality and delay marriage. Endogamy and honour codes still bound the field. The pattern is recasting, not replacement.

Model answer

Introduction

Marriage in India is still mostly arranged inside caste and community. Markets and modern forces have changed how matches are made, who pays, and how far a couple may live from kin, without simply replacing the marriage system with free individual choice.

Body

Market forces

  • Matrimonial newspapers, websites, and apps commodify bio-data: education, income, colour, and gotra become searchable filters that often tighten caste endogamy rather than dissolve it.
  • Dowry inflation in several regions follows male credential markets; a salaried groom is priced, which is market logic inside a patriarchal gift.
  • Wedding consumption and destination rituals display middle-class status, so marriage is also a consumption market.

Modern legal and social forces

  • The Hindu Marriage Act, Special Marriage Act, and court support for adult choice, as in Lata Singh, sit beside family veto.
  • Education, delayed age at marriage, and women’s employment increase bargaining inside the match, especially in cities.
  • Migration and the urban middle class produce ‘arranged love’ and translocal households, which the Rudolphs would read as modernity of tradition.

What has not been marketised away

  • Srinivas’s endogamy and Dumont’s hierarchy still organise the field of eligible spouses.
  • Honour violence where choice crosses caste or faith shows the system policing its boundary when the market of dating leaks.
  • Change is therefore in technology, timing, and conjugality, more than in the rule of who may marry whom.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  M[Matrimonial market] --> E[Endogamy filters]
  L[Law education migration] --> C[Conjugality and delayed marriage]
  E --> S[System recast]
  C --> S

Conclusion

Markets and modern forces have recast matchmaking, cost, and residence. They have not made caste marriage a free market of individuals for most Indians.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Do you think that family bondings are being affected by the changing kinship patterns in India? Comment.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Despite the efforts of the government, bonded labour still continues in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Define the concepts of 'Descent' and 'Alliance'. Differentiate between North Indian and South Indian Kinship systems with examples

    View answer →

  4. 2023 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Explain the thematic linkages between 'Patriarchy' and 'Honour killing' in India, citing some recent cases

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the changing dimensions of family structure in urban India

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations ,

    View answer →

  7. 2020 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Analyze household dimensions of family in India.

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Despite the efforts of the government, bonded labour still continues in India. Discuss.

Systems of Kinship in India

The 1976 Act abolished bonded labour in law; neo-bondage continues in kilns, farms and migration streams. Advances and contractors tie Dalit, Adivasi and other poor households season after season. Breman’s neo-bondage is market unfreedom, not only old agrestic serfdom. Rescue without credit and work leads to re-bondage. Informal capitalism and caste together explain why government effort has not ended the practice.

Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Do you think that family bondings are being affected by the changing kinship patterns in India? Comment.

Systems of Kinship in India

Kinship patterns in India are changing through migration, law, education and marriage markets. Shah and I. P. Desai separate residential nuclearisation from continuing joint family obligations. Bonds are stressed around care, authority and marriage choice. Remittances, caste weddings and digital contact keep translocal jointness alive. The family remains the main care institution for most groups.

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

Explain the thematic linkages between 'Patriarchy' and 'Honour killing' in India, citing some recent cases

Systems of Kinship in India

Patriarchy stores family and caste honour in control of women’s and men’s marriage choice. Honour killing punishes alliances that break endogamy, gotra or status rules. Manoj–Babli, Nitish Katara and Shankar–Kausalya are court-reported illustrations. Shakti Vahini 2018 rejects khap punishment and affirms adult choice. The theme is structured power, not inexplicable rage.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.