Revision summary
Household is coresidence and common consumption, not the whole lineage. Indian households vary from nuclear to joint across a developmental cycle. Gender and unpaid care structure entitlement inside the kitchen. Migrant remittances and COVID returns show the household as shock absorber. Policy must see who eats, not only the family name.
Model answer
Introduction
The household is the coresident, cooking, and budgeting unit. In India it is a dimension of family, not a synonym for the joint lineage of the texts.
Body
Dimensions
- Composition: nuclear, supplemented nuclear, joint, and single-person households coexist. A. M. Shah stressed this variety against a myth of the eternal joint family.
- Economy: pooling, women’s unpaid work, and migrant remittances make the household a class unit on Thorner’s field and in the city slum.
- Gender: Seed and Earth assigns authority and care; entitlement to food and property is ranked inside the same kitchen.
- Caste and honour: endogamy is organised from the household; factions often begin as brotherly splits of a house.
- Cycle: developmental cycle of the family means today’s nuclear house may be yesterday’s joint stem.
Change
- Urbanism, education, and Beteille’s middle class thicken nuclear living without ending lineage duties at marriage and death.
- COVID reverse migration showed households absorbing labour the market expelled.
Analysis
- Policy that targets ‘the family’ without counting who eats and who signs the land record will miss women and the elderly.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD HH[Household hearth] --> CO[Composition cycle] HH --> GE[Gender care property] LN[Lineage ideology] --> HH
Conclusion
Household dimensions of the Indian family are composition, budget, gender, caste honour, and cycle. Sociology should study the hearth, not only the clan tree.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write a note on cultural pluralism in multi-religious society like India.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is the joint family dead?
As a universal coresident group, no. As an ideal and as ritual duty, it persists.
-
Is a hostel a household?
It is coresidence without the kinship budget the family household implies.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the role of market and modern forces in understanding the changing trends in marriage systems in India -
2023 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Define the concepts of 'Descent' and 'Alliance'. Differentiate between North Indian and South Indian Kinship systems with examples -
2021 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing dimensions of family structure in urban India -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations , -
2018 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Illustrate the importance of 'Kanyadaan' and 'Kulavadhu' in changing institution of marriage and family. -
2018 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Western patriarchy which surrenders feminine principles is the development project in India. Do you agree with this view? Why? -
2018 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the impact of ban on 'Triple Talak' on marriage and divorce among the Muslim community in India. -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Clarify the distinction between "household" and "family" and evaluate Whether joint families have completely disintegrated
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.