Revision summary
Beteille’s middle class is built on education, occupation and official equality. It is not only an income group and not only Desai’s bourgeoisie. Public employment and professions historically expanded it. Caste still shadows marriage and schooling. Disharmony is the justification’s other face.
Model answer
Introduction
Andre Beteille justifies the Indian middle class as a historically new formation of education, occupation, and values of equality, not as a mere income slab. It is central to his disharmonic modern India.
Body
What he means by middle class
- It is a class of service, profession, and small property that lives by credentials more than by landed honour alone.
- Expansion after jobs in administration, teaching, and later private services made it a demographic and moral fact.
- It is not the Western bourgeoisie of industrial ownership that Desai placed at the nationalist core, though it overlaps.
Justification
- The Constitution and public employment created a career open in principle, a homo aequalis inside a still ranked society.
- Sripuram already showed class detaching a little from caste; the urban middle class is that split at scale.
- The middle class carries the public language of merit, secular office, and nuclear family, while practising caste in marriage.
Limits he would not hide
- It can be caste-shadowed: dominant-caste capital converts into degrees.
- It may preach equality and hoard school and housing, the disharmony he theorised.
Use
- Justify the middle class as a real stratum of modern India, not as a copy of Europe and not as a myth.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ED[Education office] --> MC[Middle class] MC --> EQ[Equality as value] CA[Caste marriage housing] --> DH[Disharmony]
Conclusion
Beteille justifies the Indian middle class as the social seat of official equality and occupational mobility. Its justification is historical: law, school, and office. Its contradiction is that it still marries and resides by rank.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations ,
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is the IT employee Beteille’s middle class?
Yes in occupation and consumption. Caste capital often still sits behind the campus.
-
Did he deny a working class?
No. He insisted India has several structures of inequality at once.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
In the context of changing Indian society, how do you view Andre Beteille's conceptions of harmonic and disharmonic social structures ? -
2022 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elaborate on changing nature of caste system with suitable illustrations. -
2022 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the different forms of untouchability in India. -
2021 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss different forms of kinship system in India -
2021 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the main features of the debate between G. S. Ghurye and V. Elwin on tribal development -
2021 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the various forms of untouchability in India ? Critically examine -
2018 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give a critical analysis of Andre Beteille's study of Tanjore village. -
2018 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Has caste system hindered democracy and adult franchise in India. Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.