Q1(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1 Q1 →

How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?

Topic: Perspectives on the study of Indian society. Syllabus: Perspectives on the study of Indian society: Indology (G.S. Ghurye); Structural functionalism (M.N. Srinivas); Marxist sociology (A.R. Desai). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Perspectives on the study of Indian society.

Revision summary

Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.

Model answer

Introduction

Louis Dumont stressed ideology because he thought India is a whole organised by hierarchy as a value, not by individuals as in the West. The justification is theoretical. The cost is an intellectualised India that villages only partly confirm.

Body

Why he stressed ideology

  • Homo hierarchicus treats purity and impurity as the binary that ranks groups. Texts and Brahmanical thought reveal that structure.
  • Without ideology, caste looks like a pile of customs. With it, hierarchy is a coherent social principle against Western equality.
  • The contrast of homo hierarchicus and homo aequalis is his comparative sociology.

What ‘intellectualized’ means

  • The account privileges the learned Brahmanical view. Srinivas’s field view from Rampura showed dominant caste and land that texts do not dictate.
  • Andre Beteille’s Sripuram split caste, class, and power; disharmony of equality as public creed is missing in Dumont’s harmonic hierarchy.
  • A. R. Desai would say class is not a residue of thought.

Partial justification

  • Ideology is real: people do speak purity. It is not the whole production of Indian society.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  I[Purity ideology] --> D[Homo hierarchicus]
  FV[Field class vote] --> CR[Corrects intellectualised India]
  D --> CR

Conclusion

Dumont’s stress on ideology is justified as a theory of hierarchy as value. It produces an intellectualised India that must be corrected by field, class, and the Constitution’s equality creed.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    "Secularism was an outcome of 20th century humanistic radicalism." Comment on this statement.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    "Indian caste system is unique and has been unhealthy for the growth of sociology of India." How far do you agree with this view?

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss Whitehead's contention that caste has potential to displace class and colonial contradiction.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    "Indian rural society is a faction-ridden society." Discuss.

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Give an account of the consequences and remedies of chronic malnutrition in India.

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Critically examine Dube's contributions to the study of Indian villages

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    What is caste politics? Substantiate your answer with examples of how identities are defined by caste dynamics

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.

Tribal communities in India

The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.